Contrary to internet claims+ lies+rumors, King James I was NOT a Freemason & was NOT in the occult or any secret societies -Go-To List:
π₯King James was NOT a Freemason Link
π₯Direct quote of King James I condemning witchcraft, sodomy, & other abominations Link
π₯Debunking internet lies about King James I's book Demonology Link
π₯Proof King James was not a Freemason: Freemasons admit there is no primary source documentation for King James I's supposed intiation into Freemasonry & his supposed Freemasonic "initation" is "apocryphal", which is defined as "questionable, erroneous, fictious"Link
π₯Notice how even Freemason website of "The Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon" does not even know if King James I ever became a Freemason Link
π₯Official Masonic Lodge literature says Freemasonry did not start until 1717. This also debunks the common internet lies/myths that King James I (born in 1566, died in 1625) was a Freemason/Mason & was a time-travelling Freemason/Mason, because King James I was not alive in 1717, which is the year when Freemasonry admits it started in London Link
π₯Famous Freemason Manly P. Hall is against and attacks King James I, the King James Bible, KJB Believers, and Christians [Part 1;Part 2]
π₯Some people will accuse the King James Bible of having "Masonic markings". When examined, this argument is further from the truth. For example, handshake symbols in the 1611 King James Bible represent marriages between a man & a woman-Link
π₯PROOF THAT KING JAMES WAS NOT A FREEMASON, & 1611 KJV IS NOT A MASONIC BIBLE Link
π₯KJB never says direct words of "dying to yourself daily" at all & was not made by Freemasons (aka devil worshippers)-Link
π₯There is no firsthand eyewitness accounts of King James I ever becoming a Freemason or entering any cult Link
π₯More proof King James I was not a Freemason Link
π₯So-Called Perth Agreement DEBUNKED-The Demonologie was a treatise written by King James in 1597, four years before he was falsely alleged to join the Masonic Lodge of Scoon and Perth in 1601. In his treatise, King James expressed his alarm over the spread of witchcraft in his beloved Scotland-Link
π₯β
In Demonology, King James I spoke against & despised/hated witches+enchanters:βThe fearefull aboundinge at this time in this countrie, of these detestable slaves of the Devill, the Witches or enchanters," Post 1+Post 2
π₯How then can the 1611 KJB be Freemasonic, EVEN THOUGH the KJB existed for 106 years BEFORE Freemasonry was founded in 1717? King James I died in 1625 & was not even alive when Freemasonry was founded in 1717. King James I was not a Freemason/Mason Link
π₯DEMONOLOGY A book written by King James 1st of England to expose the Witcraft of Witches that had tried to assassinate him Link
π₯People literally fall for the rumors Link
π₯King James I called witchcraft "a horrible crime" in his book Basilikon Doron Link
π₯It's over for Bible deniers Link
King James I was not involved in any wicked groups or occult groups:
πWas King James I a Rothschild, & was he related to the Rothschild bankers? No -Link
πProof King James I was not a member of the Illuminati-Link
π"Thirdly, said not Samuell to Saull, that disobedience is
the sinne of Witch-craft?" (Chapter I, Page 7, Demonology)Link
πThe King James Bible [not translated or written by King James I] exposes three major cults-Link
πKing James, the alleged time traveler be like Link
πBased Books written by King James I Go-To List Link
πTHE 1611 KING JAMES BIBLE The goal of the vicious smear campaign against King James VI & I is to ultimately discredit the King James Version/King James Bible Link
πDΓ¦monologie [Demonology/Daemonologie]. King James I biblically exposes the evils of witchcraft, sorcery, & witches Link
πIs the King James Bible a Freemasonic Text?
No, but the counterfeit freemasonic edition [a fake, counterfiet KJV edition, not the real 1611 KJB/KJV] full of Egyptian/Babylonian occult mysticism sure is Link
πCutting Edge Lodged in the Groves - A Defense of the Title Page Engraving and Other Illustrations in the 1611 King James Bible
More
πππ βπππ ππππ πππππ€ π
Post #475
371
- β€ 3
- π 2