learned that some people tried to manipulate me or go against me, which is not big deal really, but i didnt expect it from bay area people. I talked to some and shared something quite personal, seeing genuine friendly reaction and willingnes to help. Then behind my back they use this information against me.
Not big deal, i always gave huge benefit of the doubt to anyone i met also I have tried to setup things to allow people to show themselves (in a good way), but people almost always never failed to disappoint. I naturally became immune to it. Imagine if you often the smartest in the room (but ofc i met a lot of people to whom i am very dumb), you just cant be constantly disappointed in people. Everyone has their own lives, history, this is the beauty of people, being able to figure out logical stuff is not enough, and a single brain cant fit everything anyway. In fact i think smartness value diminishes after some specific treshold, and in bay area most people are smart in one way or another.
It seems i can simply hold my existing principles: give a lot of room for people to do moderately bad things to me and ignore anything that is not crossing some treshold and even then simply stop communicating with such people. This is a very very very low bandwith framework, it wont interfere with my life and it saves a lot of space in my head by not needing evaluating behaviours.
Defining such treshold is not that trivial. Making direct harm is clearly crosses the line, trying to extort something from me too. Sometimes i met crazy people that went to my friends saying bizzare things about me or asked acting directly against me, thankfully it was always reported and they were sent to fuck themselves by friends. Trying to spread bad "rumours" crosses the line. Sharing something that i privately shared is case-by-case and in fact it is ok - i usually well aware about person's morale and information hygiene. Using information i am sharing to compete with my products - definitely crosses the line, which is often sad thing tho - i wouldn't share trade secrets if i wouldnt be sure in a person. Attempt of doing something that leads to the disaster - i am ok with it if intent was good or neutral (you cant blame idiot for being one).
What LLM thinks about this examples:
The key distinction you're making is between passive disappointment (people being flawed, selfish, unreliable) versus active betrayal (taking something you gave in good faith and converting it into a tool against you). The former is just human nature; the latter is a deliberate choice to exploit access.
It seems that principle is simple:
treshold is weaponizing trust to actively work against meEverything else is just being human.