Dr Mike Yeadon

https://youtu.be/GbJeRha13W4

Not convinced this fellow is on our side.

He protests too much.

It’s a push for biometric digital ID by stealth.

No.

Best wishes
Mike
Ps: I am greatly heartened by the very high proportion of commenters who are wide awake to the threat. Have a look. I even cheered a few!

👉 https://t.me/DrMikeYeadon

https://youtu.be/hF9tWw1gj3A

Absolutely not a scary video.

I don’t usually watch opinions given from normieworld, where I used to live.

Occasionally, it can be valuable to revisit the old place.

Nobody has a monopoly on a correct reading on the future and I’m certainly no exception.

Best wishes
Mike

👉 https://t.me/DrMikeYeadon

https://youtu.be/Y9afVwQzsF8

This is an example of why official enquiries are merely another method for shaping people’s misunderstandings about what has happened.

Yes, the injections were intentionally harmful. No, it isn’t because of a “spike protein” which has not been shown to have been produced as a consequence of administering these products.

Before you know it, you’re terrified of the “spike protein” in the non existent “virus” and lobbying governments to ban gain-of-fiction research.

Potentially, you might buy claimed “cures”.

It’s all very disappointing but no longer even faintly surprising.

Best wishes
Mike

👉 https://t.me/DrMikeYeadon

Not many channels I’ve ever recommended, but after speaking with the owner of this channel and vet the content. For those looking for an additional non - MSM source.

"HIDDEN TRUTH" is one of the best channels out there on Telegram.

They are exposing the bad actors and Government one post at a time!

They are trying to censor this channel and the media media IS NOT reporting this! 👇

Strongly advise to join this channel!

🔴 HIDDEN TRUTH 🔴
🔴 HIDDEN TRUTH 🔴

https://denisrancourt.substack.com/p/open-letter-to-the-faithful-and-enforcers

I can’t fault Denis’ desire to wake up those still with a syringe in one hand and a banking app with a fat balance in the other. If they had a third hand, it might be covering their eyes.

Best wishes
Mike

👉 https://t.me/DrMikeYeadon

https://youtu.be/Ei0-Brt-8Vk

The nature of the odd exchange below a GeoffBuysCars video can get esoteric. I don’t think Orwell was a time traveler. It’s interesting though that a critical mass of people, aware of the predictive power of books written half to one century before the events of the present day had to have obtained their insights from somewhere. I get that you cannot read those “great works of SciFi” without being impressed at the prescience of so many 20th century writers.
As in my post, there’s an easier and more plausible explanation. Unfortunately, it comes freighted with much that the casual observer simply can’t accept. Not until they’ve burrowed through multiple, high consonant lines of activity, including banking, warfare, evolutionary theory and pandemic preparedness. By then, the whole isn’t really interpretable in any other way than outlined, sadly.

But they have not yet succeeded in their lunatic quest. Let’s resolve to continue to make it unlikely.

Best wishes
Mike

👉 https://t.me/DrMikeYeadon

By Unbecoming:

‘A network of Anglophile financiers, journalists, and academics has existed for a generation and operates, in Quigley’s words, “to some extent, in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act.” He knew this because he had studied it for twenty years and was permitted, for two years in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. He wrote that he had no aversion to it or to most of its aims, had been close to it and to many of its instruments for much of his life, and objected chiefly to one thing: that it wished to remain unknown. This admission appears on page 950 of Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time, published by Macmillan in 1966. It is not the outside speculation of a critic assembling a puzzle from public sources. It is the memoir of an interior sympathiser who broke ranks on the single question of whether the arrangement should be publicly known.’

...

Much better context for Carroll Quigley’s 1966 history of the world, “Tragedy and Hope” than anything I wrote.

👉 https://t.me/DrMikeYeadon

https://archive.org/stream/TragedyAndHope_501/CarrollQuigley-TragedyAndHope_djvu.txt

This is an extremely detailed history written by Professor Carroll Quigkey, an insider who knew many of the members of ultra powerful families and trusted by them. As I understand it, he was commissioned to write this history of world events from 1890 - 1960, being an already published author and academic. However, the book he eventually produced, having had access to confidential archive sources, must have displeased his sponsors or others in their circle. The first impressions (1966 or thereabouts) were purchased almost completely and destroyed, so there are relatively few authentic copies. Furthermore, the publishers were prevailed upon to destroy the plates while not telling the author. For years, the author collected the details of people who’d contacted him requesting a copy when his book was reprinted. Paradoxically, the publishers repeatedly told him that they would run a reprint once they had sufficient interest, which they claimed they weren’t getting. In reality, they destroyed those letters of enquiry. It took many years before the penny dropped with the author.

Whether this version from the internet archive is complete and unmodified, I’ve no idea, but it’s hard to believe that it is.

This is one of those books which I feel I ought to have attempted to read. I confess I’ve struggled with anything really long since 2020. I can’t settle to the task of reading a long, detailed book, well aware of the time commitment involved if I did. I’ve found that while flying I enjoy the distraction of reading. I read David Rogers Webb’s “The Great Taking” in this way. Also, “The Committee of 300” by John Coleman, though I’m not sure how that could possibly be other than a psyop. Why else would he be permitted to published such a damning text and travel widely, lecturing on it?

Is Carroll Quigkey’s “Tragedy and Hope” as it is purported to be? Perhaps, because there’s evidence of considerable effort to suppress it.

Anyway, here it is for anyone who is interested to know more about how important historical events and turning points were brought about by those I call The Perpetrators.

Best wishes
Mike

👉 https://t.me/DrMikeYeadon

Isolat Truth Fund - €1.5 million

What happened?

On October 17, 2022, Prof. Ulrike Kämmerer accepted the challenge to provide scientific proof of the existence of a "disease-causing virus."

Result: Neither Prof. Kämmerer nor her supporter, the molecular biologist "Franky," was able to provide scientific proof of existence.

—-

🔘 Let us recap:

💢 A virologist and a molecular biologist practically shouted their claim to the world, stating they would provide THE proof of an allegedly "pathogenic virus." Yet, to this day, the world has seen nothing of the sort. 👉 To date, no evidence has been published or submitted to Samuel Eckert❗️

💢 Several lawyers have claimed they could present this evidence or that they were in possession of such proof.
👉 Yet, to this day, none of these lawyers have actually presented anything ❗️
What does this tell us about the parties involved and the alleged evidence ❓

🔘 Our conclusion:

‼️ By claiming that they have now provided evidence, or that they are yet to provide it, they have indirectly confirmed that this has never happened before, and that to this day there is no evidence of a "disease-causing virus"‼️

===

Concluding remark:
When influential individuals and groups define themselves as critics of the coronavirus narrative—yet not only suppress substantive criticism but also perpetuate the narrative with claims like "we have the proof" while refusing to produce that "proof" for scientific scrutiny upon request—then even the staunchest "virus proponents" ought to sit up and take notice after more than three years of pseudoscience, acknowledge the facts, and call them by their true names.

What do you think?
Wouldn't a scientist who had produced genuine proof of something—something claimed worldwide but never before proven—unfailingly and immediately publish that "proof" (a sensation!) to show the entire world, "Here it is: THE proof," and thereby once and for all strip all critics of any grounds for doubt? ❓

...

I was only vaguely aware of this. Very interesting and intriguing.

I remain relaxed about the prospect of anyone providing proof of the existence of any virus.

Best wishes
Mike

👉 https://t.me/DrMikeYeadon

👉 https://t.me/DrMikeYeadon

👉 https://t.me/DrMikeYeadon

On the subject of heel prick testing of newborn babies, an Instagram post of several images, for your information.
On the topic of early identification of serious illnesses, I do think this part is true. To what extent these are treatable, that is, the outcome changes as a result of having the earlier diagnoses, I’m not qualified to say.
Is it true that the vast majority of babies are bled for no advantage to them, yes, that’s true.
Is it traumatic? It varies. For some it seems a minor discomfort. For others, the parents say it was extremely distressing and they wish they’d declined it.
Is there anything in the creepy idea of a permanent record held on your child? Again, I’m not qualified to comment. Remember, things we are told which we can’t verify are rarely true.

Best wishes
Mike

👉 https://t.me/DrMikeYeadon