๐๐ผ ๐๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฏ๐ถ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฐ๐น๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ถ๐ฎ? ๐๐ถ๐ธ๐ฒ๐น๐ '๐๐ฒ๐,' ๐ฏ๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ ๐ป๐ผ ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ ๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ ๐๐ผ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ป๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ผ ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ฟ.
In Case No. A56-113018/2025, a Russian entity, disregarding an LMAA arbitration clause, brought a legal action against two Russian entities. By its ruling dated 28 May 2026, the court of first instance referred the parties to the agreed forum. The court held that (1) the claimant was not listed on any sanctions list, and (2) there was no evidence that the defendants, despite being included on the UK sanctions list, would face obstacles in accessing arbitration.
The court of appeal overturned the court of first instance's ruling. By its ruling dated 22 July 2026, the court of appeal held that, since the defendants are included on the UK sanctions list, this creates objective obstacles to accessing arbitration; consequently, the dispute is subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Russian courts. The court of appeal's ruling may be subject to cassation review.
Recently, in Case No. A43-34213/2023, a Russian court, by its ruling dated 28 June 2026, upheld an LMAA arbitration clause in a case brought by a Cyprus-based entity. The court held that neither party to the dispute had been included on any sanctions list. The ruling dated 28 June 2026 has been appealed; the hearing date has not yet been set.
ProArbitration.Ru โ
Post #1058
227
Forwarded from ProArbitration.Ru
- โ 2
- ๐ 1