The Complete Mark 16:9-20 Evidence Go-To List

Mark 16:9-20 DEFENDED

Major errors and doctrinal problems caused by Vaticanus & Sinaiticus' omission of Mark 16:9-20 Link

Irenaeus (130-202 AD) quotes Mark 16:19 and says he is toward the conclusion of the Gospel of Mark
Link & Link

130-202AD: Irenaeus quotes+refers to parts of Mark 16:17-19 Link

"In Defense of the Last 12 Verses of Mark" -Dr. Phil Stringer Link & Link

Evidence That Mark 16:9-20 is part of God's Preserved Word Video Link & YT Link

Clip on Mark 16:9-20 Evidence Link & Link

Huge Mark 16:9-20 evidence: The Gothic Bible translation of 300sAD contains Mark 16:9-20 Proof-Part 1 Link & Part 2 Link

Important witnesses for Mark 16:9-20 Link

Additional Evidence for Mark 16:9-20 Link

More Very Solid Evidence and Early Christian Writers that Quoted Mark 16:9-20 Link

Codex Bezae (300sAD-400AD) has Mark 16:9-20
Complete Link
Mark 16:9-15 is on Page 675 (in Greek) and Page 676 (in Old Latin), and Mark 16:15-20 is on Page 677 (Greek & Old Latin). Codex Bezae also contains all of John 7:53,8:1-8:11 (Page Page 236/folio 133v, Page 237/folio134r, Page 238/folio 134v, & Page 239/folio 135r

Codex Sangellensis 1394 on Page 91 contains Mark 16:14-20 Link

Codex Corbeiensis II, an Old Latin codex, contains all of Mark 16:9-14 and parts of Mark 16:15-20 on folio 190. Complete link, Link and Link of Codex Corbeinsis II on Mark 16:9-20, and words/ transcription link

Codex Washingtonianus contains all of Mark 16:1-20, including Mark 16:9-20 Complete Link & Manuscript Link

Codex Alexandrinus (400sAD) has Mark 16:9-20 Complete Link & Page 41 out of 294

Another pdf on Mark 16:9-20 Link

Sinaiticus & Vaticanus Attack and remove Mark 16:9-20 Link
Modern versions unbiblically deny, put doubting notes on, and/or omit/remove Mark 16:9-20. Mark 16:9-20 KJB clearly and triumphantly exclaims: Link

A Defense of the Traditional Ending of Mark by Jeff Riddle and Video Link

On Mark 16:19-20 Proof Mark 16:9-20 Should Be Kept in the Bible https://www.kjvtoday.com/mark-169-20/

More info, info, & info (Disclaimer on the last info link: Anti Modern Versions disagrees with James Snapp Jr and his website positions, yet he presented evidence for Mark 16:9-20's authencity)

"The Last Twelve Verses of the Gospel According to S. Mark: Vindicated Against Recent Critical Objectors and Established" by John William Burgon. (Link) The evidence starts on Page 18, which is where Chapter 3 starts (Link)

More Evidence for Mark 16:9-20

http://textus-receptus.com/wiki/The_Last_Twelve_Verses_of_Mark

https://floydnolenjonesministries.com/files/130770279.pdf

https://www.trulyanchored.com/post/in-defense-of-mark-16-9-20

https://biblescienceforum.com/2015/02/03/why-are-mark-169-20-missing-in-most-modern-bible-translations/comment-page-1/

Link (We do not endorse chick tracts because they push works salvationism of repent of sins salvationism heresy)

When Mark 16:9-20 is removed, this is what happens Link

Evidence again Link

618 out of 620 Greek manuscripts and 20,000 Old Latin Bibles.

From THE MUTILATION OF MARK 16:9-20 – FLOYD NOLEN JONES, Th.D., Ph.D.:
"The external evidence is massive. Not only is the Greek manuscript evidence over 600 to 1 in support of the verses (99.99%) – around 8,000 Latin mss, about 1,000 Syriac versions as well as all of the over 2,000 known Greek Lectionaries contain the verses.2 They were cited
by Church Fathers who lived 150 years or more before B or Aleph were written, i.e.: Papias
(c.100), Justin Martyr (c.150), Irenaeus (c.180), Tertullian (c.195), and Hippolytus (c.200).3"
Citations and sources are in: https://floydnolenjonesministries.com/files/130770279.pdf

And more evidence for Mark 16:9-20 will come in the future!

Mark 16:9-20 is inspired, truthful Scripture! Modern versions want the reader to doubt and omit Mark 16:9-20 because they want the reader to doubt the resurrection of Jesus, Jesus' words to the Apostles before his acension, and Jesus' physical, literal acension into Heaven & that he sat on the right hand of God.

Follow Anti Modern Versions