Sinaiticus and Vaticanus attack Mark 16:9-20 by deleting all 12 verses. At the same time, they leave a blank column which shows that the Vaticanus writers and the Sinaiticus writer (Simonides) knew Mark 16:9-20's words existed but refused to write Mark 16:9-20. Despite Sinaiticus' and Vaticanus' omission of Mark 16:9-20, there is an overwhelming amount of evidence and earlier quotes for Mark 16:9-20 and its authenicity.
Codex Vaticanus, page 1303 (the right picture): https://digi.vatlib.it/view/MSS_Vat.gr.1209
Codex Sinaiticus (on the left picture), Quire 77, folio 5 https://codexsinaiticus.org/en/manuscript.aspx?__VIEWSTATEGENERATOR=01FB804F&book=34&chapter=16&lid=en&side=r&verse=8&zoomSlider=0
This will lead us into Part 5 of why Sinaiticus was made, and the answer may or may not surprise you.
Modern versions are based on Vaticanus & Sinaiticus, whose unbiblical errors, omission, & Alexandrian influences are inserted into all modern versions.
Follow @AntiModernVersions
Anti Modern Versions
Post #1585
1.84K

