320sAD-400AD - Part 5 of More Mark 16:9-20 Evidence - Surprisingly, Mark 16:9-20 is also in Codex Alexandrinus (Mark 16:1-16 on Page 1340 Link and Mark 16:17-20 on Page 1341 Link), which has a Byzantine/Antiochian text in its pages of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John but has an Alexandrian text in the rest of the codex's NT Books (I do not recommend the rest of Codex Alexandrinus'
NT/New Testament to relied on [except for where it has Byzantine Text in Matthew, Mark, Luke, & John] or for any Greek New Testament, due to Alexandrian influence on the rest of Alexandrinus' NT' books)
Link
Yet this is another piece of evidence that Mark 16:9-20 was in early copies of Mark 16.
Even the text that the Critical Text propenents promote & use, contains Mark 16:9-20.
Proving not only our biblical line of texts from Antioch contains Mark 16:9-20 but also the Alexandrian text had Mark 16:9-20 in it.
Follow @AntiModernVersions
Post #1526
384


- π 2