The Marauder Project

By the time of the American Revolution, the average American colonial man was at least 3 inches taller than the typical British soldier. During the British Siege of Boston, a British officer wrote home concerning the rural colonials, "remarkably tall and robust, and they are much better fed than our men."
British travelers before the war were astounded by the American diet, journaling excitedly that a man could eat three meals of meat a day. The typical Englishman was used to purely urban-oriented living, and diets composed mostly of breads, grains, and starches. They described with jealousy of no laws outlawing hunting the king's deer in the king's forest. They also paid particular attention to their backcountry behaviors and comfort in abject wilderness. This was nearly incomprehensible to the British recruits who had lived their entire lives in the urban slums of London and Liverpool. They described the Americans as "trained from their infancy to the use of the rifle."

Nazi Oak Leaf camo on the At The Front smock works great under NVG

Tfw you didn't make it in time

This is a USDI I can get behind

Ray Peat nationalism

Rangering with the boys

Storm of Steel is a book that proves all men are not equal, even within one's own race. Life is hierarchal.
The author of All Quiet on the Western Front was drafted, in the trenches for about 5 or 6 weeks before taking shrapnel, and spent the rest of the war in the hospital and subsequently transferred to noncombat roles. His takeaway - "war is hell and I'm terrified."

Ernst Jünger was an aristocrat volunteer, starting as a low enlisted man and working his way up through the NCO and then field officer ranks. He was shot and blown up literally uncountable times, and when the Kaiser surrendered Jünger refused to do so and only quit fighting when he was shot out of commission by the British. He recovered and his takeaway was, "war is hell and I quite enjoyed it."

You can usually tell someone is a huge dork if they say something along the lines of "I consider myself a thinker."

Lol ok buddy. As opposed to what? Glad you have thoughts in your skull lol.

Very real critique of modern Christianity that has permeated virtually all corners of it.
Modern Christianity has made passivity and outward appearances of "niceness" its idols. Obviously some congregations and parishes and denominations are better about this than others, but it is true to some degree nearly universally.
If billions of babies were being aborted in the Medieval period, the Pope would command the monarchs and leaders of all Catholic kingdoms to publicly execute the abortion doctors. If this wasn't done, the Pope would make a call for action to the parishioners in the affected areas. We all know this to be true.
The Church and Christians abroad will admit that issues like abortion are the largest and most industrialized genocides in human history, but will insist you MUST do nothing about it other than prayer and protest.
Passivity (the false peace) is an idol that must be condemned.

These fables just refuse to elaborate

I know she wakes up crying at night, hoping her daddy will be there this time to make her tears go away.

This is you and your child.

Preppers will argue over likelihoods of societal collapse vs revolution vs civil war vs balkanization vs nothing ever happens.

Meanwhile the elite lizard people that run society on both the right and the left are very convinced that these things are imminent and are building doomsday bunkers and running eugenics/tech projects as end days preparations.

By the way, once you narrow down these language differences, Christ's ethics concerning this are very similar to Gaulic anti-kin slaying blood feud ethics.

Our ancestors the European "barbarians" are often depicted as savages, but in reality the Germanic/Nordic cultural norms dictated "turn the other cheek" type ethics within family and clan units, because to have blood feuds within kin often meant the end of the clan and thus posed a terrible threat to the Germanic/Nordic society if not handled amicably. I do NOT think this made them weak, as many foolish people these days would have you believe any form of "mercy" is weakness. In fact I think this culture gave the Gauls/Nords such incredible strength as an interwoven and dominant European society.

For a TLDR of the previous post.

Language matters.
Christ didn't speak English. When He talked about turning the cheek and other familiar benevolent actions done towards "enemies", he used a very specific word that had a very specific meaning. The word that he was using was not the word for someone swinging a sword at you, or some politician trying to abduct your child into a satanic pedophile ring.
There are of course still Christian ethics that apply to even those enemies, but they are far more intricate and nuanced than just gay modernist nondenom Christian pacifism.

Much of the dumb modernist views that arise from mainstream Christians, and by consequence the (justified) moral/philosophical critiques by certain nonchristians, often arises from those modernist Christians thinking the Bible was written in English and deriving their opinions purely from English translations.

One of the concepts that is hard to grasp is amicability towards enemies, or what even is an enemy, in the Christian lens. Very few know what was actually written beyond what was conveyed in English and subsequently lost in translation.
There are numerous types of "enemy" words in the original Greek, and not all of them apply (or even were necessarily intended) by Christ when He spoke of this. The Greek word for "enemy" Christ used was "echthros" meaning a personal enemy, someone who you know personally that treats you poorly. A family member, a friend, a coworker, and so on. The words for public/political/military enemy were "polemios" and "hostis", weren't used by Christ.
There is obviously a souring of the meaning of the words when we read (in English) that we are told to "turn the other cheek" to an "enemy" (like someone personally involved in our life) and also have to extrapolate this meaning out to even satanic forces (Satan being "The Enemy" in English).

"What does training with weapons as an armed group/militia achieve politically?"
- fake right wing reactionary opinion as they burn him alive in his car

The moment you mention that it'll keep you from being dragged from your home and gutted in the street by George Floyd appreciators, it's radio silence from them

Friendship with McDonalds beguneth