The IRGC and Gramcoin are basically the same—they’re not afraid of the United States; they’re afraid of people exposing them. The moment the myth of being “always strong and always victorious” falls apart, the image they’ve carefully manufactured collapses too, so they and their most fanatical supporters have no choice but to keep the performance going. 🤣
Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf said, “Iran should also use diplomacy and negotiations to safeguard its national interests.” Translation: keep the tough talk, keep the slogans, but never actually close the door to negotiations.
After all the chest-thumping and grand speeches about never backing down, they end up saying exactly what they were trying to deny—they still want to negotiate. They just can’t be the first to make the move. The U.S. has to hand them a face-saving exit so they can negotiate while pretending they never backed down.
The truth is simple: it’s not that they don’t want talks—they do. They’re just terrified of losing face. The moment their loyal followers realize the regime can bend too, the whole image of being “forever tough and never compromising” starts to fall apart. 🤣
Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister said in an interview: “The United States tore up the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding. Iran will never be the first to bow down and ask for negotiations with the U.S.”
Do you know what that really means? Let me translate it: Iran is willing to negotiate with the United States, but it cannot allow anyone to see that it was the first to back down.
Secret talks are fine. Closed-door negotiations are fine. They can even negotiate on their knees, as long as they return to the cameras and keep pretending to be tough.
It is honestly hilarious. If Iran’s Revolutionary Guard is really so defiant, why not simply say, “Iran will never negotiate with the United States”? Why add the condition that Iran will not “bow down first”?
The truth is simple: they want negotiations, but they are desperate to save face. These terrorists commit some of the most evil acts in the world, yet still need to look powerful in front of their own people—even though they keep getting beaten black and blue. 🤣🤣
Let's take a magnifying glass and look for flaws in Pavel Durov, shall we? Meanwhile, I've noticed that gramcoin's recent performance remains as poor as ever. Even if I'm working overtime, I think my penis is stronger than gramcoin! 😁Goodnight everyone 😘
Pavel Durov stated: "If you want gramcoin (TON) to skyrocket, you need to take this potion I developed first, and then you will believe everything our PR team says."
Telegram allows everyone to discuss anything with peace of mind, without fear of government censorship.
Furthermore, the vast majority of Telegram users possess independent thinking, except for those idiotic investors in Gramcoin (TON). Pavel Durov constantly feeds them dung disguised as cake, and they eagerly devour it, forcing themselves to say "It's delicious!" while enduring pain. Importantly, they even encourage others to eat it.
Aside from this group, almost all users possess common sense and a sense of global awareness. Common sense and tradition are extremely important.
Telegram often accuses WhatsApp of copying it, but in my opinion, Telegram itself has also borrowed heavily from Chinese social media apps, especially Tencent QQ, in terms of design and functionality.
QQ practically accompanied the growth of several generations of Chinese people born in the 1970s, 80s, and 90s, almost monopolizing the Chinese instant messaging market in its time. With the development of the times, Tencent launched WeChat, and today these two social media apps from the same company cover almost all of China's daily social interactions.
This makes it easier to understand why Telegram has a certain appeal among Chinese users. Many of its functions and user experience are similar to QQ, making it very easy for many Chinese users to get started.
Of course, in my opinion, the biggest difference between the two is not in their functions, but in who controls the data. QQ and WeChat user data are ultimately regulated by the Chinese Communist Party, while Telegram's user data is controlled by Telegram itself. This is one of the key differences that many people consider when choosing between them.