And just as a reminder, I don’t run away from these labels, but I also just don’t accept them as valid.
I can’t denying being a “racist” or a “sexist” because they’re both meaningless labels. It doesn’t make sense to accept or deny labels that really have no legitimate meaning. Otherwise we’d also have to describe ourselves as “ableists” and “ageists” too.
HapaPerspective 🇺🇸When talking to normies or speaking in public, I still think it’s insanely boneheaded for a White Nationalist to describe himself as a “racist.” I was thinking about this today with the analogous label “sexist.” As you all know, I strongly believe that men…
In short, If I just tell someone “I’m a sexist” they’re going to be less inclined to hear what I have to say, and why I don’t think women should be soldiers or police officers. It’s the same issue with the word “racist.”
When talking to normies or speaking in public, I still think it’s insanely boneheaded for a White Nationalist to describe himself as a “racist.”
I was thinking about this today with the analogous label “sexist.” As you all know, I strongly believe that men and women are vastly different in most aspects, and that these differences are fundamentally biological. I don’t believe the vast majority of women can successfully replace men in most occupations, and they aren’t even psychologically inclined to work as hard and as creatively as the most average of men. I believe that men should generally be in charge, not because they are the “better” beings of this species, but because they were more evolved and well suited for decision making, risk taking/managing, and always end up with more of their skin in the game. I don’t believe women are inferior to men, they’re just different, but I digress. My point here is that if I told people “I’m a sexist” to try to own it and sound confident, with normies it would also effectively shut down the conversation; because at the point I would just confirm their existing assumptions and worldview regarding these matters.
The exact same thing happens when a White Nationalist says “yup, I’m a racist!” It might look brave, it may shut up his opposition because they can’t scare him with a label anymore, but it most certainly also shuts down the conversation. Most people already have it in their head the idea that “racist” means mindless-prejudice-stupid-hater person; not because they are stupid, but due ignorance and the monopoly the anti-Whites have had over language and media for so long.
White Nationalism’s success requires more normies being able to listen to our arguments without prejudging us via a stupid label. The survival of the White race depends on getting more normies to wake up and listen to us — you were once a normie!
HapaPerspective 🇺🇸The Holohoax is the best thing that ever happened to the Jews, it even granted them levels of age resistance that only adrenochrome could provide.
“These must have been the ones born in the gas chambers.” — my wife.
𝕀𝕟 𝕄𝕒𝕘𝕟𝕒 𝔼𝕩𝕔𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠Another visualization of the largest, fastest demographic decimation in world history. If it were done to anyone else, it would be called genocide. But when it's done to White people, it's called “diversity.” https://x.com/TooWhiteToTweet/status/2077040100232298828
Unlike many voices in this movement, I think this trend can be easily reversed within a century, but we probably won’t have the entire United States. An inevitable balkanization means we will probably have a new American ethnostate carved out of a geographic-majority of the current country. We won’t have California, but we’ll probably have most of the Midwest, and that’s still a big country.
All the conservative that act like the younger generation should “quit bitching and work harder” are going to be left scratching their heads when the younger generations are either avoiding having children or moving to Thailand and Vietnam where they can buy whole mansions for a could thousand dollars.
The expat phenomenon as well as economic migration are two very similar examples of why capitalism is ultimately antithetical to nationalism.
It’s very difficult for most people to be loyal to a country they can’t even afford to live in. If it’s easier for them to live better lives in more affordable countries, because runaway-capitalism has made their homeland unaffordable, there is objectively something very wrong. In the 21st century especially, you can’t claim to be 100% capitalist and also a nationalist that is loyal to his nation and homeland — it’s one or the other.
An absolute capitalist cannot be loyal to his nation and homeland, because that whole philosophy revolves around maximizing capital. In the 21st century, that means moving to which ever country is going to give you the biggest bang for your buck, and thus becoming a “global citizen” that lives internationally and has no loyalty to anything but his own capital.
I like the idea of free markets, but you also have to have limits. All economic policies should revolve around the wellbeing of the nation first and foremost.
Soccer and the subsequent world cup is really of no interest if you are a nationalist but all the seething from every usual suspect about Argentina the team, the country and the fans being openly racist is the reason why i want Argentina to win this Cup.
Call the Office of the Inspector General at (202) 616-4760 and tell them to investigate @LeoTerrellDOJ's violation of @AustinFranco123's civil rights.
Follow this script: "Please investigate Leo Terrell's violation of Austin Franco's First Amendment rights. The Free Expression Foundation filed a complaint on his behalf July 9."
Be respectful. No language or name-calling. Abide by the law. Do not use automated spam call generators.
Put pressure on the @TheJusticeDept to hold Mr. Terrell accountable. Remember, Mr. Franco is not the only victim of this abuse of power. Fight for freedom from government blacklisting!