When talking to normies or speaking in public, I still think itās insanely boneheaded for a White Nationalist to describe himself as a āracist.ā
I was thinking about this today with the analogous label āsexist.ā As you all know, I strongly believe that men and women are vastly different in most aspects, and that these differences are fundamentally biological. I donāt believe the vast majority of women can successfully replace men in most occupations, and they arenāt even psychologically inclined to work as hard and as creatively as the most average of men. I believe that men should generally be in charge, not because they are the ābetterā beings of this species, but because they were more evolved and well suited for decision making, risk taking/managing, and always end up with more of their skin in the game. I donāt believe women are inferior to men, theyāre just different, but I digress. My point here is that if I told people āIām a sexistā to try to own it and sound confident, with normies it would also effectively shut down the conversation; because at the point I would just confirm their existing assumptions and worldview regarding these matters.
The exact same thing happens when a White Nationalist says āyup, Iām a racist!ā It might look brave, it may shut up his opposition because they canāt scare him with a label anymore, but it most certainly also shuts down the conversation. Most people already have it in their head the idea that āracistā means mindless-prejudice-stupid-hater person; not because they are stupid, but due ignorance and the monopoly the anti-Whites have had over language and media for so long.
White Nationalismās success requires more normies being able to listen to our arguments without prejudging us via a stupid label. The survival of the White race depends on getting more normies to wake up and listen to us ā you were once a normie!
Post #19503
1.87K
- šÆ 14
- š¤ 4
- š 1