The US was not founded by devout Christians, but by liberals and freemasons such as George Washington, John Hancock, and Benjamin Franklin who loathed Christ and the church.

White nationalists thus have several shared values with Jewish supremacists, in that they either loathe Christ and Christian values entirely, or if they are nominally Christian, they do not wish to see Christian laws (such as those against usury, gambling, pornography, etc) be implemented in society and prefer to default to liberal/libertarian values of unlimited personal "freedom" for the human ego to pursue its base, carnal desires.

"The government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion," stated the Treaty of Tripoli of 1796, ratified by the US Senate in 1797. This is their own words — no wonder the movement to stop the creation of a central bank owned privately by the Rothschilds and other banking cartel dynasties failed twice in the early years of the US before permanently failing following the creation of the Federal Reserve, which has remained until present day.

Even the subject of Critical Race Theory is discussed within a false dichotomy. White nationalists will call it "Cultural Marxism," when the [mostly Jewish] founders of Critical Theory all came from Europe to the US where they cooperated with the CIA and the US government. These mostly Jewish intellectuals were heavily anti-Soviet, viewing the USSR and Nazi Germany as the left and right wing of authoritarianism that must be opposed. These intellectuals existed within the framework of the left and right wing of liberalism. They hated Stalin, Kim Il Sung, and other socialist "dictators" of the Global South and cooperated with the CIA to turn the western left into an instrument for the US government to target its Soviet-aligned adversaries from within the left. Since these intellectuals were democratic socialists, they still operated within the framework of secular liberalism and thus it is more accurate to refer to them as "Cultural Capitalists."

The work of these Frankfurt School intellectuals also co-opted the legitimate anti-racist struggle by spoon-feeding generations of young university students with a fake "anti-racism" that accomplishes nothing. Controlled opposition that makes sure the people avoid striking at the root of the problem and treat a certain group of racists with kid gloves, rather than being equal opportunity anti-racists. Since western universities are heavily embedded within the power structures of Zionism and imperialism, there is no way they would allow anything that is truly anti-establishment to be taught on a large scale. There is a reason that MIT allowed Noam Chomsky to continue to teach, because his work did not pose a threat to the system and this truth was revealed in the Epstein Files release.

Racist liberals like Harrison Smith and others are two sides of the same liberal coin as the pseudo "anti-racists" trained by imperialist-aligned universities' social sciences courses.

This is why man-made -isms will always fail us. This is one of the characteristics of the time close to the reappearance of the Mahdi and Christ: that mankind would have tried every -ism their limited imaginations could muster, only to realize they all fail and the only solution is to turn towards divine values being the guide for shaping socio-political systems.

We should develop independent politics based on divine values and have some self-confidence in our own beliefs. From there we can build bridges based on the common ground between us and the decent people from the left, right, and outside the fake left/right paradigm. But in order for there to be mutual respect between people of different viewpoints, committed Muslims must first have self-respect so that we don't view Islam as inferior and insufficient, always having to graft other ideologies and rhetoric (no matter leftist or rightist) onto our political views.

It used to be that Muslims would graft the Democratic Socialists of America political platform onto their own ideology. Nowadays, people are grafting the politics of anti-establishment right-wingers. Do leftists or rightists significantly alter their political platforms in favor of Islamic values when they forge alliances with us? No, they have self-confidence in their own beliefs and values. So why do we constantly live with an inferiority complex to not be confident in our own independent beliefs?

Whether it be anarcho-leftists condemning Hamas, or white nationalists like Nick Fuentes saying Islam is a religion for "brown clowns" (even though Nick is Mexican), we need to be wiser in choosing our political associates. There are many good people out there to build bridges with, why waste our energy gravitating towards those who are a reflection of the arrogance of the Zionists and imperialists?