Sometimes, researches ≠ evidence. But why? ✉️

🎱Research might not entirely reflect evidential value of even a single statement, but most beginners tend to ask theirselves how they are set to develop their idea and give evidences for their hypotheses. Publication cannot guarantee truth, it probably relies on another causation, and statistical significance is not practical validation. Additionally, bias is able to affect your references, whilst firm testimony is usually accrued from multiple lines of maintenance.

🎱When scientific work encounters a shortage of sufficient sources, authors, whatsoever, reference a plethora of various investigations even if it sounds pretty contradictory. Thus, filling your referencing list is a part of all the explorations as well. Therefore, it would be controversial to enmesh the statements with the solely one publication as long as there might be 8 studies with a positive effect and 2 with no effect.

#important