⚠️ Common Bottlenecks in PSYCHOLOGY researches:
#researchmistakes
🍭 Surveys:
Surprisingly, the processes of finding and selecting participants are an arduous journey. Students mostly conduct researches by taking questionnaire from their peers or friends, but this method is irrelevant in terms of general research, because it does not cover all age groups. For instance, emotional burnout might be widespread for all students, but it does not mean that the fatigue is a common social issue.

🍭 "Biodiversity" in topics:
Obviously, an individual should not make a research about reasons of depression, because it was investigated many times. However, this statement is true as long as the person is located in both the same time, when researches were held, and the same region where they were conducted. The reason is that some psychological phenomena are attributable to sociocultural aspects and features of parental behaviour.

🍭 Biased publications:
Young researchers are often misguided that their scientific work is supposed to have positive results matching a hypothesis. As a result, surveys with unexpected outcomes are ghosted or forgotten, but very few people take into consideration that other results lead to other conclusions which might be even more important.

🍭 Ethical constraints:
The vast majority of ideas is inappropriate or unable to be represented, because they are systematically about psychological traumas and traumatic moments. Even if a participart agreed to expose painful memories, their brain would subconsciously 'gaslight' them. It is more described by Leonard Mlodinov in his researches.