Thuletide

Libtard women aren't the only ones who support Lindsay Clancy, plenty of conservative women — even Trump voters — are claiming that she's innocent.

You cannot trust these women. If you are dating one, break up with her. If you are married to one, divorce her. It could be a matter of life and death for your children or future children.

Well, perhaps you should try reasoning with them first, since women are very susceptible to propaganda, but if they cannot be reasoned with then get the hell out of there.

Lindsay Clancy has already inspired copycat killers:

"Corie Walsh, 40, is charged with three counts of first-degree murder in the death of her son, 2-year-old Barrett Walsh"

"A neighbor found Barrett hanging from a rafter with a ligature around his neck and his feet off the ground in the basement of the Walsh family home"

"The neighbor and responding officers found Walsh upstairs in a bathtub full of bloody water, fully dressed, with cuts to her wrists and thighs"

"Prosecutors said Walsh told officers she had killed Barrett because he was the 'devil' and the 'anti-Christ.'"

"Prosecutors said Walsh had recently become highly invested in the high-profile Lindsay Clancy trial"

Why was she invested in the trial? Probably to find out if she could get away with murder by pretending to be insane!

https://www.chicagotribune.com/2026/09/04/mother-charged-murder-death-frankfort-boy/

Updates on the Trump admin's mass deportations and legal immigration restrictions:

990k+ DHS deportations, 200k+ self-returns through CBP Home and Project Homecoming, and 100k+ voluntary departures out of immigration courts. 100k+ visas revoked and 123 denaturalizations filed, both of which are records.

Trump has restrictions on 90 nations, made third-country deals with over 30 countries, and prevented migrant releases for 15 months straight. 1.8 million aliens have been de-legalized; asylum approval record low, removal orders record high; naturalization processing down 75%.

via: https://x.com/derzum_/status/2084726059560235185

Related study:

Women are more likely to be perceived as victims than men.

Female victims were perceived as experiencing more suffering than male victims.

When women were depicted as perpetrators, they were still perceived as experiencing more suffering.

Participants wanted lighter punishments for female perpetrators than male perpetrators.

Participants were more likely to forgive female perpetrators.

Female participants perceived greater victim suffering than male participants.

Female participants perceived more intentional harm when women were fired than when men were fired, while the inverse was not true for men.

This was not a jury study, but it does provide tangential evidence for a potential psychological mechanism that may contribute to the trends identified in my previous post: Women are perceived as eternal victims who experience more suffering than men even when inflicting suffering upon others. Thus, female victimization elicits harsher punishment and female perpetration receives greater leniency.

Source: Man up and take it: Gender bias in moral typecasting (2020)
https://www.lafionda.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/1-s2.0-S0749597820303630-main.pdf

Evidence that female jurors:
- Give significantly more lenient sentences to female defendants.
- Are more likely to convict when the victim is female.
- Place significantly more blame on male victims than female victims.

Saving damsels, sentencing deviants and selective chivalry decisions: juror decision-making in an ambiguous assault case (2018)
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6818429/

A Jury of Her Peers: The Impact of the First Female Jurors on Criminal Convictions (2017)
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ecoj.12562

The influence of gender and sexist attitudes on juror verdicts and perceptions of domestic violence in heterosexual relationships (2011)
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-influence-of-gender-and-sexist-attitudes-on-and-Bray/46e0881331f10bbb60a9a92c725070251ba78058

In 2011, ~75% of young women agreed that women were treated with respect and dignity in America.

By 2024, this had declined to ~40%.

As of 2025, 66% of young libtard women claim that men are significantly to blame for "the challenges women face in American society."

The only gender war legal battle they've lost since 2011 has been Roe v. Wade. In all other respects, their rights and societal influence have increased, and they are freer than ever before, but this has merely intensified their lust for power and hatred of men.

Pedo hysteria update: Being attracted to 24 year old women is pedophilia because they were once children.

Jonathan Haidt's book The Anxious Generation (2024) directly inspired digital ID and censorship laws across the West. It's frequently cited by politicians and anti-freedom campaigners as evidence that we need digital tyranny to Save The Children.

Haidt, who supports the Kids Online Safety Act, claims that social media is rewiring adolescents' brains and causing an epidemic of mental illness. He suggests that we could resolve these problems via three "foundational reforms":
- No smartphones before high school.
- No social media before 16.
- Phone-free schools.

The issue is that Haidt's book failed to prove any causal effects of social media and smartphones on adolescent mental health, let alone that they're "rewiring" people's brains.

Meta-analyses and systematic reviews have found that research on these topics is "dominated by cross-sectional work that is generally of a low quality standard... and there has been little work done to rule out potential confounders" (Orben 2020). Studies have "generated a mix of often conflicting small positive, negative and null associations" and "do not offer a way of distinguishing cause from effect" (Odgers 2020).

On causality, a longitudinal study found that "social-media use did not predict depressive symptoms over time for males or females. However, greater depressive symptoms predicted more frequent social-media use only among adolescent girls" (Heffer 2019). This was confirmed by a longitudinal directional meta-analysis that found "no causal link from social media use to well-being," although it grouped boys and girls together (Hancock 2022).

Studies that bother to disaggregate boys and girls often show no demonstrable effects on boys' mental health, and negative effects on girls' mental health. Below are extracts from the conclusion of a decent 'natural experiment' study (Arenas-Arroyo 2023):

"This study provides consistent evidence of a causal link between access to high-speed internet and behavioral and mental health (BMH) issues in 15- to 19-year-old adolescents, with girls being the primary drivers of this effect."

"our findings suggest that access to high-speed internet increases addictive internet use while reducing time spent on sleep, homework, and socializing with family and friends, with girls driving all these effects. "

"We observe an alarming effect on cases of self-harm and suicide attempts among girls in this age group (+112.3%), while no significant effect is found for boys."

"We also found evidence of girls' greater reliance on the internet to alleviate feelings of sadness or being down, with apparently unsatisfactory results. We did not find evidence of increased online bullying."

"Additionally, we find that fiber expansion has a negative effect on the quality of the relationship between parents and girls, but no effect is found for boys."

Anybody with a functioning brain can see that social media has driven women politically insane, and evidence indicates that it causally explains at least some of their decline in mental health. Since social media has zero-to-negligible negative effects on male mental health, it would make more sense to ban females from social media, specifically, rather than restricting the freedoms of teenage boys and tyrannizing men with digital ID.

Reminder: Giving people brain damage turns them into immigrant-loving libtards

Useful new website for genetic modeling, an improved version of Vahaduo:

It looks nicer, works faster, and includes new useful features.

I tested it by modeling Romanians. The first image is from Vahaduo and subsequent images show the same models run through this website's stability calculator.

A robust passing model should have good z-scores (>3) and a low G25 distance fit, but good z-scores are more important than tiny improvements in distance.

A z-score below 1 indicates that a source is adding useless noise. A z-score of 1-2 indicates that the source is absorbing residual ancestry but the signal is weak; it could be a decent but imperfect proxy, competing with other sources, or adding noise. Only keep if it makes historical sense and meaningfully improves the fit. If not, drop.

Moldavians and Transylvanians can be modeled with Thracians, Slavs, and Sarmatians/Scythians only, but Muntenians definitely require an Aegean source. Germanic can be added, but it weakens the model.

Constance Margaret Fisher murdered three of her children in 1954, then attempted suicide by drinking a bottle of shampoo, which was obviously unsuccessful.

She claimed that god had commanded her to kill her children to "save them from evil."

Before the murders, she had displayed signs of depression/anxiety and attempted suicide.

She was found not guilty by reason of insanity and sent to a mental institution.

By 1955 she had made a miraculous recovery and stopped "hearing voices," which prompted her husband to petition for her release.

She was set free in 1959.

Seven years later, she murdered three more of her children.

During the trial, she turned on the crocodile tears and pled not guilty by reason of insanity.

A police captain and a doctor both testified that she was lucid but, absurdly, she was once again declared not guilty and re-institutionalized.

In 1973, after her husband stopped visiting her, she escaped and immediately drowned herself.

Was she insane? You'd have to be to murder your children in cold blood, but she was not delusional.

In any case, insane criminals are more deserving of capital punishment than sane criminals. Just get rid of them.