Both King James I and the KJB Translators wanted "one more exact translation of the holy Scriptures into the Englifh tongue" (The Holy Bible/1611 KJB, The Epiftle Dedicatorie on Page 6 out of 1506), and the Holy Bible (which was and is also called from 1900s to today as the KJB) was translated from 1604-1611. This demolishes modern versionsists' claims of "King James I would support all modern versions and constant new translations".
Also, the KJB Translators knew that "we [we= the KJB Translators] shall be traduced by Papifh [Papish] perfons at home or abroad" (Roman Catholics) and "we shall be maligned by [self] felfe-conceited brethen". The KJB Translators knew both each other and King James I, and they foresaw the many accusations that people today make up on the KJB and King James I
πππ βπππ ππππ πππππ€ π & βπ³π π¨π±π₯π¬π©π¦π π¦π°πͺ
Post #368
1.65K

- π₯ 6