Re: Senators want to mandate anti-piracy technology ac...

Why does this automatic enforcement of law only ever cut one way?

If we're mandating that technology should enforce laws automatically, how about anti-monopoly-power technology? All mergers and acquisitions of companies above some size are automatically blocked, and they have to make a compelling case in a court of law to have the block lifted. It has to be renewed every three years, or the company is automatically broken up again.

Oh, and a simple similarity search versus the entire web, to mark patents as invalid due to prior art or obviousness.

DRM could be presumed to infringe upon fair use and other legal rights of ownership, and be automatically declared illegal (no, I don't mean that breaking it would become legal, though it would. I mean the DRM itself would be illegal, and the manufacturer would be by law forced to remove it), unless the manufacturer convincingly argues it is necessary (and re-argues it every three years).

And naturally, use of copyrighted material would be presumed fair-use, and just like wrongful takedowns don't get punished currently, if some material were proven to be infringing in a very non-automatic legal proceeding, the only consequence would be taking the material down - no other fines or punishment of any kind.

car_analogy, 5 hours ago