TGViewer
————————— ————————— @reply · 100 subscribers
Post #261 126
https://open.substack.com/pub/michaelinzlicht/p/my-p-hacking-felt-like-truth

An excellent article written by a real scientist.

It reminded me just how gameble and untrustworthy social science research can be.

As Scott Alexander puts it in his “Beware the man of one study” (which is basically one of the best essays I’ve ever read)
At some point in their education, most smart people usually learn not to credit arguments from authority. If someone says “Believe me about the minimum wage because I seem like a trustworthy guy,” most of them will have at least one neuron in their head that says “I should ask for some evidence”. If they’re really smart, they’ll use the magic words “peer-reviewed experimental studies.”

But I worry that most smart people have not learned that a list of dozens of studies, several meta-analyses, hundreds of experts, and expert surveys showing almost all academics support your thesis – can still be bullshit.

Which is too bad, because that’s exactly what people who want to bamboozle an educated audience are going to use.
More from @reply
  1. Sep 14, 2026photo post
  2. Sep 14, 2026photo post
  3. Sep 14, 2026Ok, I give up at this point Repost ≠ Endorsement
  4. Sep 14, 2026https://x.com/anishmoonka/status/2099128466818097587?s=20 Money does buy happiness.
  5. Sep 14, 2026Bernard Cohen, 1963: the press may not be successful much of the time in telling people wh…
  6. Sep 13, 2026"200 out of 600 will survive" versus "400 will die"
Threads Profile ViewerView any public Threads profile without an account.Open ThreadLook →Writing with AI? Make it sound human.Metric37 rewrites AI drafts so they read naturally. Free AI detector, 1,500 words free.Try Metric37 →