Post #330
193
Channel Public Channel
—— —————————
@reply
It’s either “nothing here is intended to communicate certainty” or “from my grandiose and objectively correct deductions”
- Subscribers
- 100
- Photos
- 170
- Videos
- 9
- Links
- 31
Recent Posts 14 shown
Post #327
163
Post #322
115
Ok, I give up at this point
Repost ≠ Endorsement
Repost ≠ Endorsement
Post #320
95
https://x.com/anishmoonka/status/2099128466818097587?s=20 Money does buy happiness.
Post #319
79
Bernard Cohen, 1963: the press may not be successful much of the time in telling people what to think, but it is stunningly successful in telling them what to think about.
The empirical backing came a decade later (McCombs and Shaw, 1972, the Chapel Hill study). They surveyed undecided voters during the 1968 US election on which issues they considered most important, then content-analysed the news those voters were actually consuming. The rank order matched almost perfectly.
Ive never read those studies. I'm talking merely from my own experience and observations.
Apparently, an incoming stream of information sets a cognitive agenda. Every now and then, one gets a freshly prepared list of things worth having a position on.
One never gets to ask himself:
Why do I really care about X in the first place?
Do I get substantial benefits from thinking about it?
Do I enjoy thinking about it?
Post #318
68
"200 out of 600 will survive" versus "400 will die"
Post #317
76
No shit
Post #316
111
This post (sticker, poll or similar) has no web preview. Open in Telegram
Post #315
118
@ PG
Post #314
157
@ PG
Post #312
197
I just finished writing a small essay that I really liked. I liked both the essay and the very fact that I wrote something longer than a few sentences. Then, out of curiosity, I sent it to Claude, and once again he factually destroyed me (also it turns out a few guys had explored the same thing 10 times more ridiculously in the 1990s and came to much cleaner and deeper conclusions) Once again, I felt like a barbarian and deleted the entire note page.
Post #310
137
@ Tyler Cowen
Post #308
133
Post #307
102
About this channel
- How can I read @reply without a Telegram account?
- TGViewer shows the public web preview Telegram publishes for —————————: recent posts, photos, videos and the subscriber count, with no app, login or account.
- How many subscribers does ————————— have?
- ————————— (@reply) has 100 subscribers on Telegram, refreshed roughly every 30 minutes.
- Does ————————— know I viewed it here?
- No. Public channel previews carry no viewer identity, and TGViewer has no accounts or tracking of what you look up.