🇷🇺🇨🇳🇧🇾🇰🇿 𝗖𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘁 𝗨𝗽𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗻 𝗘𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗰𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝗥𝘂𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗮 (𝗦𝗲𝗽𝘁𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟭𝟬 – 𝟭𝟳)

🇨🇳 A Russian court has recognized and enforced a decision of a Chinese court ordering a Russian company to pay roughly $569,500 plus late-payment interest to a Chinese company. The debtor argued that the court lacked jurisdiction over it and that enforcement would violate international currency-control rules; the court rejected both arguments. The debtor has filed a cassation appeal (decision dated 10.09.2026 in Case No. A40-205251/2025).

🇧🇾 A Russian court has recognized and enforced a decision of a Belarusian court imposing subsidiary liability on a Russian individual for a company's debt, payable to the Belarusian state budget. The court first restored a missed three-year enforcement deadline, finding the creditor's repeated attempts to present the writ for execution a valid excuse (decision dated 11.09.2026 in Case No. A40-259897/2026).

🇧🇾 A Russian court has recognized and enforced a decision of a Belarusian court imposing subsidiary liability on a Russian individual for a company's debt, at the request of Brest Customs, legal successor to the original claimant for part of the claim (decision dated 14.09.2026 in Case No. A40-218655/2026).

🇰🇿 A Russian court has recognized and enforced a Kazakhstan-seated award ordering a Russian company to pay a debt to a Kazakh company (decision dated 15.09.2026 in Case No. A56-86239/2026).

🇰🇿 A Russian court has recognized and enforced a decision of a Kazakh court ordering a Russian company to pay a debt to a Kazakh company (decision dated 16.09.2026 in Case No. A56-86638/2026).

🇧🇾 A Russian court has rejected objections to the recognition and enforcement of a decision of a Belarusian court ordering Avangard LLC to pay a debt to individual entrepreneur Igor Makovik. The debtor and other interested parties argued that a settlement agreement in an unrelated corporate dispute should offset the amount, but the court found that agreement had no bearing on the foreign proceeding and let the recognition stand (decision dated 17.09.2026 in Case No. A62-6255/2026).

ProArbitration.Ru ✈