TGViewer
ProArbitration.Ru ProArbitration.Ru @proarbitrationru ยท 144 subscribers
Post #20 172
๐Ÿ“ The "Lugovoy Law" has no limits. Any obstacle to bringing a case to arbitration renders an arbitration agreement ineffective. A case goes to a state court. Although a decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation deals with the LCIA, I see no reason why the same approach should not be applicable to any arbitral institution. One would say that there are "unfriendly" institutions and there are "friendly" ones. Is that right? Should I recall court decisions against "friendly" institutions? There is no dividing line between "friendly" and "unfriendly" institutions, but there is something else (the decision in case No 305-ะญะก24-13398 of 28 November 2024). #Lugovoy

ProArbitration.Ruโœˆ
More from @proarbitrationru
  1. Oct 16, 2026Post #216
  2. Oct 13, 2026๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณBy a decision dated 5 October 2026 in case No. A40-149292/2026, a Russian court reโ€ฆ
  3. Oct 12, 2026๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ ๐‚๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ญ ๐”๐ฉ๐๐š๐ญ๐ž๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง ๐„๐ง๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐œ๐ž๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐ข๐ง ๐‘๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐š (๐Ž๐œ๐ญ๐จ๐›๐žโ€ฆ
  4. Oct 6, 2026๐—” ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐˜‚๐—ฝ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ต๐—ผ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ด๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผโ€ฆ
  5. Sep 29, 2026๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ ๐‚๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ญ ๐”๐ฉ๐๐š๐ญ๐ž๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง ๐„๐ง๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐œ๐ž๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐ข๐ง ๐‘๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐š (๐’๐ž๐ฉ๐ญ๐ž๐ฆโ€ฆ
  6. Sep 28, 2026๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฒ A Russian court has refused to recognize and enforce a ruling of an Armenian courโ€ฆ
Threads Profile ViewerView any public Threads profile without an account.Open ThreadLook โ†’Writing with AI? Make it sound human.Metric37 rewrites AI drafts so they read naturally. Free AI detector, 1,500 words free.Try Metric37 โ†’