๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ถ๐ฎ๐ป ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ป๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ, ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ท๐ฒ๐ฐ๐๐ ๐ฃ๐๐ฏ๐น๐ถ๐ฐ ๐ฃ๐ผ๐น๐ถ๐ฐ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ ๐ข๐ฏ๐ท๐ฒ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐. In Case No. A60-26002/2026, a decision dated 24 July 2026, a Russian court issued a writ of execution for an ICC arbitral award rendered in an arbitration seated in Moscow and held:
1. An assignment of a claim under a foreign trade supply contract from a Dutch assignor to a Russian assignee does not, in itself, violate Russian public policy and does not fall under the Russian counter-sanctions measures.
2. Refusing enforcement of an award on public policy grounds requires two cumulative elements: a breach of the fundamental principles of the Russian legal system, and the occurrence of harmful consequences โ damage to sovereignty, to the interests of large social groups, or to constitutional rights. The respondent failed to prove any such consequences.
3. The argument that the tribunal was improperly constituted (a sole arbitrator instead of the three provided for in the contract) was rejected on estoppel grounds: having failed to object to the tribunal's composition at the ICC case management conference, the respondent forfeited the right to raise this ground at the enforcement stage.
ProArbitration.Ru โ
Post #199
90
- โค 1