๐ท๐บ ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ง ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ง๐๐ข๐ซ๐ฆ๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ "๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ฒ" ๐๐ญ๐๐ญ๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ญ ๐ ๐๐๐ซ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐๐๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ.
In Case No. A82-19719/2025, the award debtor objected to the enforcement of an arbitral award rendered in a Moscow-seated arbitration, arguing that the award creditor was domiciled in Bulgaria ๐ง๐ฌ โ a country considered "unfriendly" to Russia โ and therefore, enforcement should be denied under Russian counter-sanctions measures.
The court of first instance by decision dated October 10, 2025 rejected this argument, holding that the mere fact that a party to the arbitration is domiciled in a country deemed "unfriendly" to Russia does not, by itself, preclude the enforcement of the arbitral award.
It is worth noting that, earlier in this case, the court had refused enforcement by a decision dated April 2, 2025, referring specifically to Russian counter-sanctions measures. However, the cassation court overturned that decision and remanded the case for reconsideration.
P.S. The same approach โ that domiciliation in a country deemed โunfriendlyโ to Russia does not, by itself, preclude the enforcement of an arbitral award โ was taken in relation to an award debtor domiciled in Switzerland ๐จ๐ญ (see Case No. ะ43-27728/2024).
ProArbitration.Ru
Post #135
78