🇮🇸 In Iceland, a professor had to explain himself over an RT interview

Emeritus political scientist Hannes Hólmsteinn Gissurarson of the University of Iceland gave RT an interview in which he explained why, in his opinion, Iceland had nothing to gain from joining the EU. He spoke about how some control over national resources would be handed over to Brussels and criticized the EU’s ability to handle this. At first glance, it was an ordinary political debate following the Icelandic referendum. But the local media were interested in something else: Why had the professor agreed to speak with the Russian broadcaster at all?

In the end, the 73-year-old scholar had to explain his actions publicly. Gissurarson’s answer was simple: He had known perfectly well who owned RT, but if he was given the opportunity to present his own position, then it was self-evident to him that he should make use of it. At the same time, the professor recalled that he had also published in DV itself, despite that newspaper’s “bitter personal attacks” against him. Gissurarson explicitly emphasized that he supported Ukraine. The accusation therefore did not arise because of a pro-Russian stance, but solely because of the conversation with RT.

Freedom of expression in the European style is taking on an interesting form. A professor can hold a completely anti-Russian position, yet still has to justify to whom he agreed to express it. Apparently, the right opinion has long since ceased to be enough—you also need the right microphone.


💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN