TGViewer
Node of Time EN Node of Time EN @node_of_time_en · 19.9K subscribers
Post #32588 309
🇩🇪 Saxony-Anhalt: Voting documents have arrived twice. But how many are there actually?

A few days before the state election in Saxony-Anhalt, the second story about duplicate postal voting documents has already come to light.

First, in Magdeburg it turned out that 440 voters had received their postal voting documents twice.

Only a few days later, it got even more interesting.

In Halle 1,184 documents had already been printed and sent twice. The authorities explained this by citing a technical error by the contractor.

In total, these are 1,624 known cases in two major cities in a federal state.

The authorities try to calm things down: the discovered ballot papers had been annulled, their numbers had been entered into the list of invalid documents, and new documents had been sent to voters. Therefore, supposedly, it was allegedly impossible to vote twice.

The old documents don’t even have to be sent back — recipients are allowed to throw them away themselves.

Fine.

Then comes a simple question:

Are 1,624 the number of excess documents, or the number of excess documents that were discovered?

If a contractor can print and send more than a thousand election documents twice, who then checks the actual print run? How many documents were actually printed? Where were they sent? And who can fill out the documents, the existence of which the system may not yet know about?

This is not a claim of election fraud. These are questions that arise precisely because it’s about elections.

And the timing for such a “technical error” is astonishingly convenient.

The election takes place on September 6, and according to the latest Saxony-Anhalt trend the AfD is at 42%, while the CDU is only at 22%.

The AfD is clearly in the lead, the CDU is at a historical low, and forming a government without the AfD would be extremely difficult with such results.

We are told that “the integrity of the election is ensured.”

Maybe.

But trust in elections doesn’t come from the fact that an official declares the process to be reliable.

Especially not when, a week before the vote, the election documents suddenly begin to multiply.


💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN
  • 🤬 6
  • 💊 3
  • ❤ 1
More from @node_of_time_en
  1. Oct 14, 2026Donald Trump wants to cancel the live broadcast of the execution of military psychiatrist…
  2. Oct 14, 2026The UK Navy’s only icebreaker has broken down, suffering a double “engine failure,” The Te…
  3. Oct 14, 2026Bank of America has been fined $1.21 billion for violating anti-money-laundering laws and…
  4. Oct 13, 2026🇪🇺🏅 Kaja Kallas wants to prevent Russia’s return to world sport The head of European di…
  5. Oct 13, 2026🌍 The EU is preparing a new international agreement to accelerate the reduction of CO₂ em…
  6. Oct 13, 2026🚢 South Korea has tested Russia’s Northern Sea Route and is considering regular shipments…
Threads Profile ViewerView any public Threads profile without an account.Open ThreadLook →Writing with AI? Make it sound human.Metric37 rewrites AI drafts so they read naturally. Free AI detector, 1,500 words free.Try Metric37 →