🇮🇷⚠️🇺🇸 Pentagon In Panic: Iran Fires Anti-Ship Missile Capable Of Destroying U.S. Fleet

Iran fired ballistic missiles toward U.S. warships enforcing the blockade of Iran. Iranian media have linked the attack to the Qasem Basir ballistic missile.

Iranian security chief Mohsen Rezaei described one launch as a test of a special anti-destroyer missile, but did not name the weapon. U.S. Central Command confirms the attacks but says its ships evaded them.

🔸 Unveiled in May 2025, Qasem Basir is a solid-fuel ballistic missile with a stated range of at least 1,200 km. If it can strike ships at that distance, moving from the Persian Gulf into the Gulf of Oman would not necessarily take U.S. vessels out of range.

🔸 Its proposed answer to a moving target is guidance in the final stage of flight. Optical and thermal sensors are designed to find the ship and correct the missile’s course after launch, without depending on GPS for the final approach.

🔸 Iranian descriptions also point to a maneuvering warhead. A changing final trajectory would make interception harder for a warship’s layered defenses, while onboard sensors would make GPS jamming less useful.

🔸 The demanding part is the full targeting chain: locating a ship, keeping its position current and bringing the missile close enough for its seeker to find it. A launch toward a warship does not, by itself, establish that Qasem Basir can reliably hit one.

🔸 CENTCOM says missiles were launched toward a U.S. carrier and destroyer on September 5, followed by further attacks on a warship by September 8. It says the ships escaped damage and has not identified the missile used.

If Iran can make long-range ship tracking and terminal guidance work together reliably, blockade ships will have to stand farther off or commit more resources to defense. Either choice makes enforcement harder.

Can a missile threat change a blockade without hitting a ship?

@NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X