Also, I was talking to Joel Davis a couple weeks ago because he’s been charged under this 93ZAA legislation for ‘Abolish the Jewish Lobby’.
In his brief of evidence, it isn’t even specific lines of his speech, but rather the police try to assert this whole vague combinational effect.
That wearing black jackets, that it was all men, that he did some chants, and the speech, all in combination, created a general nazi vibe and that if a hypothetical Jewish person had happened to walk past, they may have been offended, upset or threatened.
Its literally, “well, it’s not the words exactly, but the fact you did it nazi-ly”
Obviously he’s fighting the charge in court next February because it’s ridiculous, protesting ethnic lobbying is clearly a political demonstration.
Post #412
1.44K
Jack Eltis An academic has posted a journal in Sydney Law Review where they speculate that the NSW Government’s section 93ZAA legislation, on banning racial vilification is possibly unconstitutional. Their assessment walks through the three part Lange test, noting that…
- 👍 120
- 💯 43
- 😁 6
- ❤ 3
- 👀 3
- ⚡ 1