TGViewer
Jack Eltis Jack Eltis @jackeltis · 2.37K subscribers
Post #411 1.42K
An academic has posted a journal in Sydney Law Review where they speculate that the NSW Government’s section 93ZAA legislation, on banning racial vilification is possibly unconstitutional.

Their assessment walks through the three part Lange test, noting that it captures ordinary political speech surrounding immigration and political phrases, and is “constitutionally fragile”.

She also talks about how the “Abolish the Jewish Lobby” protest resulted in no charges after a long police and parliamentary inquiry, but that Joel Davis was charged near 6 months later after royal commission pressure, noting issues with sporadic and selective enforcement against certain political speech.

This is one of many unconstitutional laws passed by the tyrannical NSW government, another being the vague “Nazi Conduct” law.

All of which must be challenged in due time.

https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/SLR/article/view/23431
  • ❤ 94
  • 👍 28
  • 🔥 14
  • 💯 10
  • ⚡ 3
  • 👏 1
More from @jackeltis
  1. Oct 12, 2026Everyone knows Chris Minns bends over backwards for the Jewish ethnic lobbies (such as ECA…
  2. Oct 12, 2026The girlboss longhousers in Australian politics and media are already seething about the l…
  3. Oct 12, 2026Ultimately the banning has only legitimised the broader movement with the public. The ban…
  4. Oct 11, 2026Organisations are effective because they are a sum of their parts and collective manpower…
  5. Oct 10, 2026When you look at how the prohibited hate group laws are structured, with the pheonixing pr…
  6. Oct 9, 2026This decade is the era of grievance politics. We need to create and ignite new grievances…
Threads Profile ViewerView any public Threads profile without an account.Open ThreadLook →Writing with AI? Make it sound human.Metric37 rewrites AI drafts so they read naturally. Free AI detector, 1,500 words free.Try Metric37 →