An academic has posted a journal in Sydney Law Review where they speculate that the NSW Government’s section 93ZAA legislation, on banning racial vilification is possibly unconstitutional.
Their assessment walks through the three part Lange test, noting that it captures ordinary political speech surrounding immigration and political phrases, and is “constitutionally fragile”.
She also talks about how the “Abolish the Jewish Lobby” protest resulted in no charges after a long police and parliamentary inquiry, but that Joel Davis was charged near 6 months later after royal commission pressure, noting issues with sporadic and selective enforcement against certain political speech.
This is one of many unconstitutional laws passed by the tyrannical NSW government, another being the vague “Nazi Conduct” law.
All of which must be challenged in due time.
https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/SLR/article/view/23431
Post #411
1.42K
- ❤ 94
- 👍 28
- 🔥 14
- 💯 10
- ⚡ 3
- 👏 1