TGViewer
Pascal Najadi Pascal Najadi @impascalnajadi · 15.7K subscribers
Post #3032 6
🔻 THE PATIENT SHOWED SIGNS OF LIFE. THE ORGAN PROCUREMENT PROCESS HAD ALREADY BEGUN.

There is a sentence in an American government record that should stop you cold: “At least 28 patients may not have been deceased at the time organ procurement was initiated.” Not a movie script. Not an anonymous message. The words appeared in an HHS announcement on July 21, 2025.

Start with 351. That is how many cases federal investigators examined at one organ procurement organization. Donation had been authorized, but ultimately was NOT completed. Of those cases, 103 showed concerning features. Seventy-three patients had neurological signs incompatible with donation. At least 28 may not have been deceased when the process began.

351 → 103 → 28. Each number narrows the file until the abstraction disappears: a patient who might still be alive, inside a process preparing for organ recovery.

The findings included poor neurological assessments, questionable consent, failures to coordinate with medical teams and misclassified causes of death, particularly in overdose cases. HHS identified the greatest vulnerabilities in smaller and rural hospitals. Behind those clinical phrases are families being asked to make irreversible decisions while depending on people they cannot independently check.

Then comes the detail that changes the entire story: the transplant network’s earlier internal review had found no major concerns. The federal investigation found clear negligence. A case previously closed without action was ordered reopened. The first review was not the final word.

Now watch November 18, 2026. New national requirements for donation after circulatory death take effect. A formal safety-pause process. Families and clinical professionals informed that they can call for a pause. Discrepancies in neurological assessments documented and escalated. Unplanned pauses reported. At least five minutes between circulatory cessation and the start of organ recovery.

The five minutes are a safeguard. So is the ability to say STOP—and have the concern addressed instead of letting a time-sensitive process carry everyone forward. A signature authorizing donation cannot erase the obligation to protect the person who signed it.

Transplants save lives. That is exactly why donor safety cannot be sacrificed to the urgency of saving someone else. Trust does not mean hiding the failures. It means making sure the failures cannot hide behind trust.

Trace: 351 / 103 / 28 — November 18.

A donor can save a life. A donor must never be treated as if they have stopped having one.

HHS record · HRSA timeline

⟁

Subscribe @imPascalNajadi
More from @impascalnajadi
  1. Oct 18, 2026🚨 No one knows just how bad NATO’s current situation really is. Take a look at what’s hap…
  2. Oct 18, 2026photo post
  3. Oct 18, 2026THE HERO'S JOURNEY NESSON DORMA NON SHALL SLEEP Subscribe @imPascalNajadi
  4. Oct 18, 2026🔻 97 YEARS IN PRISON. PROSECUTORS SAY THE TRAFFICKING CONTINUED. A sentence longer than m…
  5. Oct 18, 2026HOLY COW!!! Watch as Tens of THOUSANDS of Brazilian Patriots rally for Flavio Bolsonaro: T…
  6. Oct 18, 2026video post
Threads Profile ViewerView any public Threads profile without an account.Open ThreadLook →Writing with AI? Make it sound human.Metric37 rewrites AI drafts so they read naturally. Free AI detector, 1,500 words free.Try Metric37 →