TGViewer
Channel Public Channel
Hersantite

Hersantite

@hersantite

Subscribers
4.43K
Photos
150
Videos
368
Links
152

Showing posts older than #695 · Back to latest

Older Posts 19 shown
Post #694 1.53K
Post #693 4.63K
There’s nothing wrong with so-called low IQ anti-Semitism
  • ⚡ 236
Post #692 1.61K

Forwarded from Aus NS Archive 🇦🇺

Brendan Lim SC returning on Day 2 to have to face the bench for another grilling.
  • ⚡ 199
Post #689 2.38K
Multiculturalism is eroding the ethical system which underpins the legal systems of the West
  • ⚡ 175
Post #688 1.6K

Forwarded from Aus NS Archive 🇦🇺

James Mason reads and reacts to my article on the White Australia Party’s hearing in the High Court.
  • ⚡ 123
Post #687 2.78K
AUSPILL White authors are explicitly excluded from this bookstore in Australia, but how far does their ban go? From AUSPILL (X)
  • ⚡ 170
Post #686 1.41K

Forwarded from AUSPILL

White authors are explicitly excluded from this bookstore in Australia, but how far does their ban go?

From AUSPILL (X)
  • ⚡ 189
Post #685 3.35K
Hersant shorts if they were actually good
  • ⚡ 260
Post #684 2.07K
Using offensive behaviour laws to police politics allows magistrates to decide which opinions are allowed
  • ⚡ 175
Post #681 2.45K
‘We didn’t dissolve the party. We just made being a member of it a crime punishable by 7 years in jail.’

I may have misspoken. This could be the funniest argument the Commonwealth made. They seem unfamiliar with the phrase ‘a distinction without a difference’.

Their logic is about as sound as saying ‘I wasn’t cheating on you. I was just exploring other options.’
  • ⚡ 211
Post #680 1.65K

Forwarded from Aus NS Archive 🇦🇺

This is the bit where Gageler had identified that in essence, it was similar to the forced dissolution of the Communist party.

Whilst the language is different, "prohibited" vs "dissolved", in substance it is the same.

Seemed Sharifys arguments earlier of "you cannot run an organisation from jail" resonated.

Justice Beech-Jones also made an observation that members are forced to resign or be subject to punishment.
  • ⚡ 140
Post #679 1.53K

Forwarded from AUSPILL

I asked the speaker of the house for comment on White Australia Party’s high court challenge against his government’s laws which banned them. I think he forgot what democracy is..

From AUSPILL (x
)
  • ⚡ 182
Post #678 2.68K
Aus NS Archive 🇦🇺 The Australian seething that political communication exists. https://archive.is/Tj1KJ "Reform has finally arrived for one of the High Court’s worst ideas: 1992’s implied constitutional freedom of political communication. It is a judicial creation never approved…
How many contradictions does Chris Merritt want to have in one opinion piece?

These traitors hate freedom (implied or otherwise) and they hate that the constitution outlines a system whereby Australians freely choose their representatives.

They believe in freedom only in the very basic and limited way that any despot does: freedom for me and tyranny for you.
  • ⚡ 139
Post #677 1.6K

Forwarded from Aus NS Archive 🇦🇺

The Australian seething that political communication exists.

https://archive.is/Tj1KJ

"Reform has finally arrived for one of the High Court’s worst ideas: 1992’s implied constitutional freedom of political communication. It is a judicial creation never approved by the Australian people."

"Legal Expert" shabbos goy Chris Merritt (half of whose articles are about jews and israel) really believes that political communication is one of the High Court's "worst ideas" and is not a right that Australians agree with or deserve.

Jews and their cuck supporters hate our Anglo concepts of freedom and free speech.

Not every boomer but always a boomer.
archive.is High Court must fix implied freedom of political communication or dum… archived 10 Sep 2026 12:47:21 UTC
  • ⚡ 131
Post #676 2.68K
The widespread mongrelisation in Central and South America has ruined those parts of the world
  • ⚡ 232
Post #675 3.79K
In my view, this is probably the funniest legal argument the Commonwealth deployed in the whole case.

You thought robbing Peter to pay Paul was bad: try disenfranchising Clancy to enfranchise Zhang, Mohammed and Arjun.

Non-Whites are such natural liberal-democrats that they need the host nation to be violently suppressed by the state in order to be able to participate. How would they survive another name on the ballot?
  • ⚡ 288
Older posts →
Threads Profile ViewerView any public Threads profile without an account.Open ThreadLook →Writing with AI? Make it sound human.Metric37 rewrites AI drafts so they read naturally. Free AI detector, 1,500 words free.Try Metric37 →