In my view, this is probably the funniest legal argument the Commonwealth deployed in the whole case.

You thought robbing Peter to pay Paul was bad: try disenfranchising Clancy to enfranchise Zhang, Mohammed and Arjun.

Non-Whites are such natural liberal-democrats that they need the host nation to be violently suppressed by the state in order to be able to participate. How would they survive another name on the ballot?