Australia is a Third-World banana republic in all but name – with a Third-World economy, Third-World laws and an increasingly Third-World population.

Take a look at the reasoning of King’s Counsel who are paid millions of dollars to think and argue about laws.

Popular sovereignty can stop popular sovereignty so we need to stop popular sovereignty when popular sovereignty stops popular sovereignty.

Sometimes A stops A, so we need to stop A before A stops A.

These are apparently our nation’s most gifted legal minds.

But of course, popular sovereignty to these people just means a popular sovereignty that reflects the politics of the current government. What they are talking about here is not popular sovereignty, but multiculturalism.

Sometimes popular sovereignty stops multiculturalism, so we need to stop popular sovereignty before popular sovereignty stops multiculturalism.

Sometimes A stops B, so we need to stop A before A stops B.

This is what the laws amount to. The government is just too dishonest to admit that they believe that liberal-democracy is over now and it has been replaced with police-state multiculturalism.

If the Zionists want the Australian Government to be able to ban political parties that oppose Zionism and multiculturalism, then they should hold a referendum and ask the population if they want to change the Constitution from a liberal-democratic document into a police-state multiculturalist one. As it stands today, that is the process that the Constitution outlines.

If the High Court rules in favour of the Commonwealth in this case, it will only prove that the Constitution isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on.