A wicked Hapa of the West, for the West. We must reclaim America.
If you like my work, please consider buying me a cup of coffee: buymeacoffee.com/HapaPerspective
If you want to direct message me: @thehapaperspective
Post #19804
226
HapaPerspective Chat White “sluts” can still have white babies, so thinking of them as “damaged goods” can be detrimental to the propagation of the white race, especially if you’re the one who’s hesitant to start a family with a girl whose “body count” is too high (in other words, she’s not “pure” enough). The reality is, you should judge the girls you date as the individuals they are. Even if it’s true that the average girl who has a “high body count” is “damaged goods,” it doesn’t mean that every single girl with a high body count is damaged goods. What if she just really likes sex and has a strong sex drive? Wouldn’t that be a great thing for a marriage? The need for virginity and purity has made a lot of white men miserable, lonely, and childless. If a woman has bad character and would make a bad wife, you will know that by spending time with her, getting to know her on dates, seeing how she responds to difficulties, etc. You really don’t have to obsess about how many cocks she’s sucked.
I think it’s a mistake to use one extreme here—guys obsessing over absolute 100% virginity in our era—to try to argue for another extreme—having a relationship with someone that has a very high body count. As you said, we are all entitled to our preferences. Some of this is down to personal limits and is relative to what we are used to.
But it’s just a fact that most men will always find women with higher body counts as a far less attractive candidate for marriage, and there are solid evolutionary reasons for that aversion. I shouldn’t have to explain why it’s biologically critical for a man to avoid starting a family with a woman that has a high body count. Being cuckolded is one of the worst things that can befall any man, along with pair boding issues that are ever present with anyone, male or female, that has had many sexual partners. All the science on this stuff says avoid having a relationship with anyone that has a high body count.
If you still want to defend the idea of turning sluts into housewives, by all means, you can marry one if you want. Just don’t get upset if your children’s biological father isn’t actually you. Beyond a certain body count, it becomes a buyer beware issue.
And back to the Cornell 7 context that the OP was responding to. The lesson for women (and men too) is that if they want to exercise their sexual freedom, they should be aware of all the consequences, such as reputational damage—this is what parents should be teaching their young adult children. With great freedom comes greater accountability, and they must accept being ostracized instead of blaming others or fabricating false rape accusations. A woman that voluntarily does drugs and sleeps around has to understand that she is already putting herself at risk and will naturally (and rightfully) have less credibility if she goes to the authorities about any sexual misconduct. It’s like playing on train tracks and then trying to sue the train conductor because you finally got hit by the train, when you just shouldn’t have been playing on the train tracks to begin with.
But it’s just a fact that most men will always find women with higher body counts as a far less attractive candidate for marriage, and there are solid evolutionary reasons for that aversion. I shouldn’t have to explain why it’s biologically critical for a man to avoid starting a family with a woman that has a high body count. Being cuckolded is one of the worst things that can befall any man, along with pair boding issues that are ever present with anyone, male or female, that has had many sexual partners. All the science on this stuff says avoid having a relationship with anyone that has a high body count.
If you still want to defend the idea of turning sluts into housewives, by all means, you can marry one if you want. Just don’t get upset if your children’s biological father isn’t actually you. Beyond a certain body count, it becomes a buyer beware issue.
And back to the Cornell 7 context that the OP was responding to. The lesson for women (and men too) is that if they want to exercise their sexual freedom, they should be aware of all the consequences, such as reputational damage—this is what parents should be teaching their young adult children. With great freedom comes greater accountability, and they must accept being ostracized instead of blaming others or fabricating false rape accusations. A woman that voluntarily does drugs and sleeps around has to understand that she is already putting herself at risk and will naturally (and rightfully) have less credibility if she goes to the authorities about any sexual misconduct. It’s like playing on train tracks and then trying to sue the train conductor because you finally got hit by the train, when you just shouldn’t have been playing on the train tracks to begin with.
- 💯 11
- 👍 2
- 👏 2





