🇺🇸🇮🇷 US Navy’s post-Iran war readiness ‘false positive’ could come back to haunt it

The Navy’s real readiness assessment after the USS Abraham Lincoln’s marathon deployment and other war commitments is “artificially high,” Vice Chief of Naval Operations Adm. James Kilby has warned.

He called the picture “a false positive,” addressing the National Commission on the Future of the Navy.

The true cost will surface later, he added.

Key pressures:

🌏 ships remain deployed or haven’t returned for maintenance, artificially inflating readiness rates

🌏 deferred maintenance and skipped modernization to meet short-term combat demands

🌏 shipyards face looming backlog as vessels return

🌏 compressed training cycles leave crews with little flexibility

🌏 unmanned systems could ease demand for full carrier or amphibious groups, but that option is still years away

The sober assessment came a day after War Secretary Pete Hegseth praised sailors aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln for a record deployment of 265 consecutive days without a port call during the US war on Iran.

He fumed at “a few folks in the media” who he claimed tried to portray Lincoln’s deployment as ‘a symbol of dysfunction” with reports of food shortages, broken plumbing and sailors attempting to jump overboard.

👍 Substack | Chat | @geopolitics_prime