What is the Global Predictor, and how does it exercise power?

The Global Predictor (GP) is a conceptual subject with global-level responsibility in suprastate global governance that governs processes of planetary (global) significance (i.e., world governance) on the basis of conceptual power.

Conceptual power is the highest form of power in the distribution of the complete governance function among the specialized types of intra-societal power within the process of societal self-governance. It should be understood in two senses:

First, as a type of power (in relation to the system of differentiated specialized powers) that provides society with a concept of its life as an integrated whole across generations.

Second, as the power of the concept (the Idea) itself over society (that is, as the informational-algorithmic internal skeleton of culture and the foundation for society’s entire life and activity).

In the first sense, it is the power of specific individuals whose personal qualities enable them to perceive opportunities, select goals, discover and develop paths and means to achieve the goals they choose at their own discretion, and to implant all of this into the collective psyche of society — as well as into the formation of statehood. In other words, it is the introduction of a concept (an Idea) into society that guides the life activity of both individuals and society as a whole — which, in turn, constitutes power in the second sense.

All those who are conceptually powerless are hostages to conceptual power in both senses of the term. This is precisely why in a society of conceptually powerless individuals, neither democracy nor human rights are possible.

The Global Predictor is NOT structurally formalized and NOT personalized; it governs peoples, countries, and states through the control and formation of public/state ideologies and systems of education and science — all in accordance with the governance concept of the GP itself. Such suprastate/supranational structures — whether formal, like the United Nations, or informal, like world Freemasonry — are merely instruments through which the GP carries out the coordination of international relations and (supra)state governance. Therefore, identifying the governing subject and the process of GP governance through conventional structural conspiracy analysis is, a priori, impossible.

From State, the first volume of the three-volume series "War. State. Bolshevism."

✅ Help grow the FCT community — share this post!