Pay close attention when you hear the phrase “there is no evidence that vaccines cause harm” or “there is no evidence that vaccines cause autism.”
Because what that statement really means is something far more disturbing.
It means there is no evidence at all.
No real science proving they don’t.
I know this because we went looking for it. We didn’t speculate. We didn’t guess. We sued the CDC. We said, “Show us the studies.” Not opinions. Not press releases. The actual trials you rely on to say vaccines do not cause autism.
We made it simple.
Just the first six vaccines given in the first six months of life.
Hepatitis B. DTaP. Polio. The basics.
Send us the studies.
What did they send back?
Twenty studies that didn’t include any of those vaccines.
Not one.
So let’s just be clear: there is no science showing that hepatitis B, DTaP, or polio vaccines do not cause autism. Period. That science does not exist.
What they did send were a handful of heavily manipulated studies focused almost entirely on the MMR vaccine which is the vaccine at the center of Vaxxed. And even there, the data is riddled with assumptions, exclusions, and statistical gymnastics designed to protect a conclusion that was decided in advance.
This entire narrative that vaccines are conclusively proven safe when it comes to autism is built on assumptions, wishful thinking, and forceful propaganda. Not on rigorous science.
And that becomes a very serious problem when injuries are no longer rare, when chronic illness is exploding, and when parents are watching their children suffer while being told, “There’s no evidence.”
No...there’s just no evidence either way.
Pretending that equals safety is not science.
@delbigtree
Post #69
53