TGViewer
Лебедев про мозг Лебедев про мозг @augmented_brain · 6.19K subscribers
Post #15800 325
Our study was desk-rejected by the Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation (JNER) without any peer review.

📄Read the paper: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2025/12/05/2025.12.05.25341696.full.pdf

This is despite the study perfectly matching the topic of their own call for papers:

🔗 Special Collection: https://link.springer.com/collections/iidcefccbf

When a manuscript that directly answers a specific call is dismissed out-of-hand without feedback, it raises serious questions about editorial bias and transparency.

Since JNER’s editorial team feels our work doesn't meet their undisclosed criteria, I’ll be taking a very close, public look at what does pass their standards. Over the coming weeks, I will be publishing detailed methodological reviews and critiques of papers recently accepted by this journal.

Science deserves open critique and objective evaluation—not arbitrary gatekeeping.

#Neuroengineering #Neurorehabilitation #OpenScience #PeerReview #AcademicPublishing #ResearchIntegrity #JNER
  • 👍 1
More from @augmented_brain
  1. Oct 4, 2026Из рубрики «Подражание Сапольски» История о двух мозгах Возьмите действие — лишение жизни…
  2. Oct 4, 2026В продолжение предыдущего поста. Нейрофизиология планирования: спинальное планирование или…
  3. Oct 3, 2026Красивые нейрофизиологические парадигмы и суровая реальность видеозаписей Есть в нейронаук…
  4. Oct 3, 2026From the series "Philosophical Parables" Once, Sadhguru told Ksenia Sobchak: — Exhale. Inh…
  5. Oct 2, 2026Картинка дня
  6. Oct 2, 2026Момент истины
Threads Profile ViewerView any public Threads profile without an account.Open ThreadLook →Writing with AI? Make it sound human.Metric37 rewrites AI drafts so they read naturally. Free AI detector, 1,500 words free.Try Metric37 →