You’ll often hear certain women and woman-bureaucrats in particular talk a lot about “feeling safe”.

But I’ve noticed that their idea of “feeling safe” has little in common with actual safety.

You have to remember that words are just noise and a means to an end. What one creature really means when it spits out a certain word might not have much to do with that word’s literal definition.

A normal person would assume the term “safe” means protected from or not exposed to danger or harm, but that’s not what the system-ladies mean when they appeal to safety.

“Feeling safe” is a remark associated with control, equality dogma and so-called “inclusive environments” (read: ideology, more women and more migrants).

“Feeling unsafe” is the noise made concerning “the Far Right” (read: White guys and the discussion of facts, respectively).

But White guys are statistically far less likely to pose any physical threat to women. They’re less likely to assault them, less likely to murder them and almost never rape them.

Migrants of certain demographics rape, assault and murder women (and girls) at dramatically higher rates.
Actually, the danger migrants pose to females increases in direct proportion to the fewer White guys there are in a respective area.

Women can’t and don’t effectively protect other women from harm. Only men will do that and statistically, White men do it most often.

Women may literally be more safe when they’re in the company of White guys than they are in any other environment, except perhaps a panic room.

The more White guys there are and the fewer migrants, the safer women are. These “hate-facts” are cold data.

So what are the government ladies actually talking about when they claim to be “feeling safe” or “unsafe”?

Well these terms are not just an imagined female experience, they’re a power-play which ironically just ends up making society far more dangerous for women.

If you pay attention, “feeling safe” means: “Feeling right and in control of a verbal exchange.” While “feeling unsafe” means: “Being proven wrong and feeling stupid or without power”.

When a woman-bureaucrat in parliament for example says “I feel unsafe” she doesn’t mean she is being threatened or at risk of any measurable harm. She means “I am being made to feel wrong or stupid by a fact, a general consensus or by what someone else is saying.”

In summary, it’s far more important for government-women and their equivalent male-effeminates to feel right and in-control than it is for anybody to be safe. These lawmakers will actually sacrifice the safety of all of society’s women in exchange for power or even just the feeling of power.

It’s eery to think that as a country, while importing the third-world we are gleefully shutting down open discussions, censoring facts, limiting speech and banning political parties all on the basis of very obvious language manipulation and just so women can feel powerful.