TGViewer
Channel Public Channel
Valueverse

Valueverse

@valueverse_ai

Your guide in value narratives:
app.valueverse.ai
Subscribers
188
Photos
26
Videos
1
Links
64

Showing posts older than #19 · Back to latest

Older Posts 18 shown
Post #18 220
Who earns when everything is going down?

DEX tokens

DEXes literally have been printing fees today. An overview coming soon.
  • 👍 4
Post #16 232
GOLD & Crypto flash crash

Deleverage🙈
  • ❤ 2
  • 👍 1
Post #14 226
We estimate that the number of DeFi assets with solid fundamentals is < 20.

The good news is that this number will rise to the hundreds (or even thousands) in one to two years.

By identifying them early, we can find fundamental gems.
• For example, $CVX made dollars per token since launch and rose to $50.
• $AERO, priced at $0.03, earned $0.22 per token in cash flow in the following years.

These assets exist, and we just need to analyze them quickly and make the right moves.
• Clear input data
• Revenue multipliers (not F/S, P/S, and all that legacy stuff).
• Growth models accounting for dilution.

A kind of a plan for Revenue Meta

https://x.com/valueverse_ai/status/2016792140224074022
X (formerly Twitter) Valueverse (@valueverse_ai) on X Truly, only few ones have a value Less than 20 tokens with tangible revenue & value (add $CRV, $YB, $AERO, $PENDLE) to your list And it’s for entire DeFi!
  • ❤ 2
  • 👍 1
  • 🔥 1
  • 💯 1
Post #13 1.94K
Post #12 219
Post #11 198
$CRV $YB $AERO $VELO epochs completion soon

New data & updated multipliers coming
  • 👍 1
Post #7 139
Feedback from Aerodrome founder
  • 👍 1
Post #6 119
The State of Cashflow Pricing:

- Buyback revenue is generally more expensive than direct fee sharing (except $PUMP)
- Owning $1 of tokens in $CRV, $AERO, $PENDLE, or $YB earns up to 3-7x yield vs. average buybacks
- The $UNI revenue is 28 times more expensive than $CRV and 74 times more expensive than $AERO.

Details in our recent research piece:

https://x.com/valueverse_ai/status/2015931557995758017?s
X (formerly Twitter) Valueverse (@valueverse_ai) on X Valuing Cashflow Without Narratives
  • 👍 1
Post #5 93
Protocol revenue ≠ tokenholder revenue

P/F, P/S are protocol-level, not token-level metrics.

We introduce Effective Multipliers, accounting:
- token revenue (not protocol revenue)
- cashflow-receiving token supply instead of circulating supply

It is designed for: How expensive is the token relative to the cashflow it captures?

https://x.com/valueverse_ai/status/2011937946459345361
X (formerly Twitter) Valueverse (@valueverse_ai) on X Pricing the Revenue: Effective Revenue Multipliers
  • 👍 1
Post #3 102
2025 exposed a major disconnect in crypto. Adoption, infrastructure, and regulation advanced, while token prices lagged and fundamentals remained underpriced. Most new tokens now trade below TGE, signaling a shift toward value-driven markets.

Our 2026 Thesis shares our perspective on token design, market structure, and value capture. We look at why market structure can override fundamentals, how Ethereum creates and accrues value beyond revenue, and why revenue sharing and sustainable tokenomics will define the next cycle.

We also highlight under-the-radar breakthroughs in 2025 and outline how token valuation frameworks must evolve in 2026 toward value-receiving supply, revenue attribution, and automated analysis.

Link to the full thesis ⬇️
  • 👍 1
Post #2
Channel photo updated
Post #1
Channel created
Threads Profile ViewerView any public Threads profile without an account.Open ThreadLook →Writing with AI? Make it sound human.Metric37 rewrites AI drafts so they read naturally. Free AI detector, 1,500 words free.Try Metric37 →