Authorial narratives as a distinguishable diversity
#Integral #theory and #practice

I will begin to gradually introduce the basic concepts of multi-poetry, the purpose of which is to create an even more precise apparatus for describing various processes and relationships between elements of the poetic environment.

Yes, I'm no mathematician, but even at this stage of the development of my ideas, which serve to describe poetry in its entirety, one can speak of a complex of signifiers with fairly clear boundaries of distinction. Today I'll talk about the lines, or narratives, that any average author constructs, consciously or unconsciously.

The themes of our works can be determined by our values, needs, aspirations and dreams, spiritual or everyday experiences, concepts and insights... And each of these categories, as a source of inspiration, represents a process that continues throughout our lives. It could be trauma, interest, social attitude, or the cultural code of our environment, but it is something we experience as part of ourselves and convey through our works.

Any author's narrative creates its own space (semantic, ontological, cultural, etc.), which emerges through the connections between its parts, between linguistic elements (words, syntactic constructions, works, etc.), and the narrative's metadata. Following V. I. Moiseyev, the founder of the Russian school of Neo-All-Unity philosophy, I will divide this space, or local environment, into two planes.

Plan of relativity

This is the space in which all transformations occur and connections are formed between different-level elements and parts of the narrative. Each element of the system (idea, value meme, expressed need, etc.) is marked during narrative analysis and can be tracked over time, provided, of course, the author dates their works.

Singularity Plan

But despite the traceability of the elements, even the most experienced suspect, psychoanalyst or literary scholar will not be able to go beyond the semantic self-closure of the elements themselves as self-identical names, beyond their semantic and structural boundaries, black holes - points of the system.

In my work, I highlight the following narratives:

⚛️#Scientific
♒️#Quantum
⛎#Experimental
♊️#Street
💜#Civil
♓️#Classic
🟣#Actual
☮️#Ecological
🚺#Cosmic
☸️#Futurological
🟪#Generative
☯️#Integral
💟#Love
🆔#Psychological
🕉#Meditative
☦️#Religious
😈#Mystical

Hashtags in that post is not work, but the channel has plenty of examples for almost every one of them in Russian...

Each of them has its own distinctive style, vocabulary, topic, and thematization, the combination of which will vary as each develops. Having studied the metapoetic structure of my texts, I saw how each narrative grew from a single trunk, separated, defined itself, and, through the fullness of its unfolding, moves toward merging with all the other narratives, toward expressing the concept of hyperconnectedness through the image of a tree. And this is precisely the fundamental idea of ​​integral art—to unite, to bring together a previously differentiated and clearly distinguishable multitude of elements, while preserving the uniqueness of each.

If you feel close to this integration of all your creative skills (not just narratives), then you're moving toward integral, unifying development, and my posts can serve as your guide along this path. Subscribe and share.

There will be more benefits later.😏

✈️@Treeinside
📔Tree Inside