We plan to integrate LLMs (AI) to make fact‑finding more convenient. AI can be biased and make mistakes, so it must be treated as a tool for vector search and text generation, not as a super‑intelligence. Vector search is based on information from a dataset or the internet. Models are typically trained on real scientific publications. By design, a model is not biased toward any particular source of information. We will also attach a link to the source on which the model’s output is based.

In this way, each of you will be able to check with one click whether the text corresponds to reality. A topic may have several sources of truth. What to regard as truth is your choice and yours alone.

Thus, if EU fact‑checking carries weight for you, you will be able to examine it alongside other sources. Such a system does not violate EU law while preserving users’ rights to know and to consider other viewpoints.

It will likely be fair to give users a choice among LLMs. A request may go to a centralized provider or potentially to a decentralized provider such as @Cocoon. We do not limit your choice. We provide a tool that you can use at your discretion.

— 3. Interoperability between messengers —

Although we are not among the designated "gatekeepers", we would like to offer our view. The initiative is interesting, but it requires agreement on a single E2EE protocol for all messengers as well as the ability to verify its implementation through open‑source code.

Consider this scenario: our users send messages to WhatsApp users. We implement E2EE and open our source code, thereby proving that we truly implemented it. In that case, we also expect WhatsApp to follow the same rules. Otherwise, a leak on WhatsApp’s side would affect our messenger’s reputation. We would be blameless, yet we do not want to be associated with negative headlines. We oppose this initiative if our partners will not open their source code.

It is worth remembering that laws, like coins, have two sides. It is incorrect to claim that all laws bring only harm. One should carefully weigh pros and cons, rights and duties. The core principle of law is to protect people from harming one another. What is harm? It is not for us to judge, since we do not possess the truth. You determine truth yourselves. You have the right to speak, and you have the right to be heard. If you spread disinformation, be ready for criticism. If you speak the truth, be ready for criticism as well. This is the power of the internet. Only bots are standing in the way - and we'll challenge them. ⚔️

Fun fact: under the GPL public license, all third‑party Telegram clients based on its source code must publish their code openly.

We would also be glad to present future integration with Telegram’s Secret Chats, as they fully comply with our policy.
Unfortunately, integration with regular Telegram chats is impossible due to the lack of end‑to‑end encryption on Telegram’s side. We look forward to a protocol update from Telegram. To achieve this, we must demonstrate the value of encryption across all chat types. We cannot do this without your support. The louder the community’s voice, the greater the chance we will be heard. The more serious the competition we pose to Telegram, the more often it will listen to its users.

Keep your private data safe
Seek the truth and find your own understanding of it
Communicate freely with your friends

We continue our work thanks to your support ⚙️
We continue to stand for peace, safety, and freedom. 🕊
Thank you to everyone who is with us. 🤍