Post #8184
4.49K
Fertility has declined for all women under age 33
#fertility
#fertility
Channel Public Channel
TH Thuletide
@thuletide
Nationalist, Classical Liberal, moderate centrist (circa 1900). You can plagiarize any of my writing & content. Follow: t.me/racerealismchannel
- Subscribers
- 22.7K
- Photos
- 6.2K
- Videos
- 559
- Links
- 2.9K
Showing posts older than #8185 · Back to latest
Older Posts 13 shown
Post #8179
6.34K
This is how women inflate their collective sexual bargaining power: Significantly downplay male attractiveness, significantly exaggerate female attractiveness. They do this instinctively with zero coordination required.
A woman expressing any degree of humility, as in the final three screenshots, is committing the worst sin imaginable in the eyes of the gynocratic hivemind — just look at the hysterical freakout she's caused.
A woman expressing any degree of humility, as in the final three screenshots, is committing the worst sin imaginable in the eyes of the gynocratic hivemind — just look at the hysterical freakout she's caused.
Post #8178
4.43K
"Emotional intelligence" is just IQ + agreeableness.
Post #8176
4.57K
Regarding the genetic origins of the Slavs:
I ran many tests using various samples and the best fitting model that I could create for modern Russians, Belarusians, and Ukrainians used the following sources:
- Latvia Bronze Age
- Sweden Iron Age (Goths)
- Bulgaria Iron Age (Thracians)
- Ukrainian Scythians (Russian Sarmatians gave very similar results).
- Asiatic Uralics with a mix of EHG + Siberian ancestry
In the targets, I added some Iron Age Balts and a couple of early Slavs for comparison.
In the sources, I also included Hellenistic Anatolians to represent any migrants from the Roman Empire, a south Caucasus sample, Medieval Turkic (Cuman), and Mongols (Golden Horde), but these ancestries only appeared sporadically and at noise level (<2%).
Perhaps the forthcoming genetic study will refute my model, but I think this is probably pretty accurate, since it aligns with Slavic linguistic history (e.g. Scythian loanwords) and archaeological history (e.g. Gothic neighbors).
I ran many tests using various samples and the best fitting model that I could create for modern Russians, Belarusians, and Ukrainians used the following sources:
- Latvia Bronze Age
- Sweden Iron Age (Goths)
- Bulgaria Iron Age (Thracians)
- Ukrainian Scythians (Russian Sarmatians gave very similar results).
- Asiatic Uralics with a mix of EHG + Siberian ancestry
In the targets, I added some Iron Age Balts and a couple of early Slavs for comparison.
In the sources, I also included Hellenistic Anatolians to represent any migrants from the Roman Empire, a south Caucasus sample, Medieval Turkic (Cuman), and Mongols (Golden Horde), but these ancestries only appeared sporadically and at noise level (<2%).
Perhaps the forthcoming genetic study will refute my model, but I think this is probably pretty accurate, since it aligns with Slavic linguistic history (e.g. Scythian loanwords) and archaeological history (e.g. Gothic neighbors).
Post #8175
5.42K
New genetic study on the origin of the Slavs:
The Proto-Balto-Slavs originated from a mix of Bell Beaker, Corded Ware, Baltic Hunter-Gatherer, & Ukrainian Neolithic populations.
The more westerly PBS populations of eastern central Europe were replaced by Scandinavians via the Gothic expansion into Poland, Ukraine, & Hungary, which began during the Iron Age.
The Goths were later replaced by Slavic populations, presumably from the forest-steppe zone of southern Belarus or northern Ukraine. This likely occurred during the Migration Era, when many Goths fled westward to escape the Huns.
These Slavs descended primarily from the more easterly PBS populations, but carried increased EEF & CHG ancestry, likely due to mixing with the Dacians/Thracians of southwestern Ukraine. The Bronze Age & Roman-era populations of Poland did not contribute substantial ancestry.
Note that the paper specifies "Slavic-period genepool"; it's entirely possible that the earliest Slavs were genetically indistinguishable from Balts.
The Proto-Balto-Slavs originated from a mix of Bell Beaker, Corded Ware, Baltic Hunter-Gatherer, & Ukrainian Neolithic populations.
The more westerly PBS populations of eastern central Europe were replaced by Scandinavians via the Gothic expansion into Poland, Ukraine, & Hungary, which began during the Iron Age.
The Goths were later replaced by Slavic populations, presumably from the forest-steppe zone of southern Belarus or northern Ukraine. This likely occurred during the Migration Era, when many Goths fled westward to escape the Huns.
These Slavs descended primarily from the more easterly PBS populations, but carried increased EEF & CHG ancestry, likely due to mixing with the Dacians/Thracians of southwestern Ukraine. The Bronze Age & Roman-era populations of Poland did not contribute substantial ancestry.
Note that the paper specifies "Slavic-period genepool"; it's entirely possible that the earliest Slavs were genetically indistinguishable from Balts.
Post #8174
4.76K
Good summary of pre-Darwinian evolutionary theories.
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evolution-before-darwin/
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evolution-before-darwin/
Post #8173
5.14K
Post #8172
5.06K
I'll be sharing tweets here from now on because I'm too lazy to copy paste the contents individually
Post #8171
5.25K
Post #8170
5.39K
Forwarded from Thuletide
Okay, new twitter account:
https://x.com/thltd_/status/2050681448726728787
Same @ as the old account, since it was deleted for inactivity.
https://x.com/thltd_/status/2050681448726728787
Same @ as the old account, since it was deleted for inactivity.
Post #8169
7.64K
Women of average height (5'3) exclude men of average height (5'9) and below from their dating app height preferences.
Only men over 6' (top ~14.5%) exclude women of average height and below.
Women have gone insane - a six inch height difference is still huge.
Only men over 6' (top ~14.5%) exclude women of average height and below.
Women have gone insane - a six inch height difference is still huge.
Post #8166
6.81K
This graph allegedly depicting "sexual market value" over time is often posted online. It's a total fabrication, not based on any data, only the wishful thinking of its creator, an aging "bachelor."
Male SMV does not peak at 36, when the average 36 year old man is fat, bald, and wrinkly, nor does Female SMV peak at 23, by which point they are already fat, tattooed, and have double digit body counts.
F SMV peaks pretty much as soon as they reach physical sexual maturity (adult-like secondary sexual characteristics).
M SMV peaks a few years later due to slower biological development and female desire for wealth/status.
F SMV is more fragile and time limited, but both M & F SMV decline quickly with age.
M & F SMV decline can be somewhat mitigated by not ruining your body; far more important for women, since their body is basically all they have to offer.
M SMV decline can be mitigated to varying degrees via wealth/status, but women who are obsessed with male wealth/status are generally... not wholesome.
Male SMV does not peak at 36, when the average 36 year old man is fat, bald, and wrinkly, nor does Female SMV peak at 23, by which point they are already fat, tattooed, and have double digit body counts.
F SMV peaks pretty much as soon as they reach physical sexual maturity (adult-like secondary sexual characteristics).
M SMV peaks a few years later due to slower biological development and female desire for wealth/status.
F SMV is more fragile and time limited, but both M & F SMV decline quickly with age.
M & F SMV decline can be somewhat mitigated by not ruining your body; far more important for women, since their body is basically all they have to offer.
M SMV decline can be mitigated to varying degrees via wealth/status, but women who are obsessed with male wealth/status are generally... not wholesome.
Post #8165
6.55K
