ΠΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ½ ΠΠΎΡΠΈΡ ΠΠΎΡΡΠΊΠΈ, ΠΌΠ΅ΠΉΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΉΠ½Π΅Ρ ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉΠΌΠ²ΠΎΡΠΊΠ° Giraffe, Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΡΡ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΌΡΡΠ»ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡ(Π°)ΠΎΠ²:
https://dusted.codes/open-source-documentation
key takeaway ΠΈΠ· ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ:
I put all initial documentation into the README.md file inside my Git repository.
Almost two years-, nearly 50 releases-, 47 total contributors-, more than 800 GitHub stars and more than 100 merged pull requests later the project's simple documentation approach hasn't changed much, and to be honest I have very little motivation to do something about it.
The main reason why I'm not particularly excited about migrating Giraffe's documentation to a different place is because I actually believe that the current way of how documentation is handled by Giraffe is a perfectly well working solution for its users, its contributors and myself.
In Giraffe the entire documentation - a full reference of what the web framework can or cannot do and how it integrates and operates within the ASP.NET Core pipeline - is placed in a single DOCUMENTATION.md file inside the project's Git repository, right next to the README.md file.
#en #article #resource
Post #277
838