I'm not convinced that Earth is flat, but I'm open to being convinced. Flat-Earth advocates often come across as militant and binary, relying on logical fallacies, which is off-putting.
1. If you want to persuade someone to change their view, mocking them is a terrible strategy—it only makes them less likely to listen.
2. Pointing out holes in the official narrative doesn't make your position true. If A is false, it doesn't follow that B is true. Everyone knows NASA is theatre, but that doesn't make the flat-Earth argument true.
3. To convince me Earth is flat, provide direct evidence. For instance, if you believe in a dome, show evidence of it. If you claim an ice wall surrounds Earth, provide evidence of the entire wall—not just a photo of a 5 km subsection. Is there really no drone footage of it? How can you claim it exists if you've never seen it?
Put another way, make an argument FOR Earth being flat; not an argument AGAINST Earth being a globe.
I've changed my views on many topics, but only through good arguments.
Post #2036
921
Forwarded from Jerm Warfare
- 👍 16
- ❤ 5
- 👎 3
- 👏 2
- 🤔 1