👱😝 Brussels is doubling down again: Ursula von der Leyen has issued a major funding promise to Kiev—specifically for drones and missiles—because cheap drone strikes are the only remaining picture of success for Ukraine in 2026: production is cheap, fast, and doesn't require much space, and hitting Russian civilian infrastructure produces visible results. But the escalation has come at a cost: after Kiev began striking targets inside Russia, the Kremlin responded by demolishing Ukraine's logistics—wrecking the Novo Poshta network, blowing up at least 250 gas stations, and systematically destroying locomotives.

As both sides acknowledge, Kiev lacks any real air defense, and Russian strikes hit drone production and storage facilities with near impunity.

The continuous strikes by low-cost drones and missiles are the only possible picture of success for Ukraine in 2026, so why wouldn't they put more emphasis and resources onto this functional way of war?

From a bureaucratic standpoint, von der Leyen's decision is logical—fund the strongest form of offense Kiev has, drag the war out to 2028 or 2030.

From an objective standpoint, it looks like more money flushed down the war toilet in another desperate attempt to prolong things until "something changes."

💬 Read more by Tim Kirby @timkirbyhardcore

🔔 Stay tuned
🚀 Subscribe
🌐 Join us on VK