spill @bangtannbase

yet somehow handling one issue properly is already too much to ask. embarrassing.

jaiz, do your job properly for once. your base isn’t even that big lololololol.

if i ever find proof that they’re still in your base after all this, i’m coming straight back to you. good luck, silly.

sharing a termination announcement on a channel barely anyone even sees is useless btw, if you’re really that confident in your decision, share it on your own base where your LOVELY tannies can actually see it.

at least remove that bitch from your fucking base and unadmin in both your base and discuss if you actually terminated them. what kind of “terminate” is this? you kick them out on paper but still keep them around like nothing happened? fucking hilarious. either you terminate them or you didn’t, admin. pick one.

hey lanka, you really dont have to be that scared that you went as far as removing your username on your roleplay account.

its honestly kind of a shame that Jaiz hasn’t taken any action on this so far. do i really need to bring your former admins here to speak about how poorly your management has handled this base, and how criticism is apparently mocked or dismissed behind closed doors when its brought up? if this is how you choose to respond when legitimate concerns are raised, then maybe the issue isn’t just the admin you’re protecting, but the way the base itself handles accountability.

i had to say this, but you guys are genuinely allergic to criticism. the second someone questions your moderation, you shut the conversation down instead of actually addressing the concerns. 😂

at the end of the day, if you’re really really willing to take responsibility for someone as your admin, you should also be willing to properly address concerns raised about them, Bangtan Base.

what bothers me the most is how they handled the situation. bro, if the person in question is currently an admin in your base, then OF COURSE their conduct and background are still relevant to your team, especially when the concern is specifically about their involvement in other bases and their previous conduct. instead of properly addressing the concerns or asking the admin in question to clarify everything themselves, the response eventually felt like, “if you still have a problem, just talk to them directly.” they’re literally your admin.

i’m not asking the base to blindly take my side. i’m asking them to actually investigate an issue involving someone they chose to put on their team. if the concern turns out to be unfounded after a proper investigation, then fine. but dismissing the discussion before the questions are properly answered doesn’t exactly make their moderation process look reassuring.

this is where i asked them to provide clearer proof regarding the username transfer timeline, because honestly, the explanation felt strange and raised more questions than it answered. instead of addressing that specific point, they suddenly decided to close the discussion and stated that the matter would end there LOL. which is super weird, considering the questions i raised were still unanswered and the timeline they provided still had things i wanted clarified. i was asking for clarification and proof regarding the explanation they themselves gave me. but somehow, the discussion was considered “over” before those questions were properly addressed.

then, after i followed up, they came back with another explanation. according to them, the username had been transferred to the Finlanka’s partner, then transferred again to someone else, before eventually returning to Finlanka.

and as you can see, i’m not saying this timeline automatically proves anything by itself. i’m saying there are discrepancies that deserve to be explained properly, especially when the proof provided by the base is being used to support their version of events.

you can also see that i had to reach out to them again today because my previous message was left unanswered. they had clearly received my message since yesterday, yet i didn’t receive any proper response or even a simple confirmation that they were looking into the matter. so yes, i had to follow up again just to get a response regarding the very evidence and clarification they themselves asked me to provide.