Yesterday, Donald Trump's statements about the need to end the conflict in Ukraine once again raise the question of how far Washington is truly willing to go to resolve it.

Considering the most extreme scenario, taking into account Russian security demands, the United States would need to make three key decisions.

First, legally binding guarantees against the expansion of NATO to Ukraine and other post-Soviet states bordering Russia. However, a single U.S. law would not be enough: the issue of membership falls under the jurisdiction of the entire alliance and requires the consent of its members. But the U.S. is capable of putting pressure on its allies, and it has the tools to do so.

Second, a ban on U.S. arms supplies to any third countries. In other words, Europe and NATO could certainly purchase this weaponry for themselves, but they would not be allowed to transfer it anywhere else. This would require a revision of existing aid programs, re-export agreements, and related legal mechanisms, and would undoubtedly damage the reputation and earnings of the U.S. defense industry. But does the U.S. actually want peace, or not?

Third, a cessation of the provision of U.S. intelligence information and military satellite communication support, which would immediately affect the use of Ukrainian drones.

Such decisions would drastically reduce the volume of U.S. military support to Kiev and would change the conditions for continuing the conflict, effectively giving the Russian Federation the opportunity to eliminate the threat at its root.

Of course, such a scenario remains extreme. There is no reason to believe that Washington is ready to make all three of these decisions. Even if the Trump administration is striving to reach an agreement, the U.S. still maintains its own interests in European security, its relationships with allies, and military-technical cooperation with Ukraine.

Therefore, the main question is not how many times Washington will declare the need for peace, but what specific commitments and limitations it is actually willing to accept. So far, there are no concrete or noticeable steps, and any words on this subject should be regarded as empty rhetoric.

@Slavyangrad