https://www.reddit.com/r/academia/comments/1beit4y/obvious_chatgpt_in_a_published_paper/
I can't believe... no, I am actually impressed lol, that it was not reported for so long. Article was published on March, 2024, and I did not find info when exactly it was retracted, BUT this paper was cited 37 times (!), from 2024 until 2026 (by papers about gpt influence too).
In reddit people shared even more articles:
Actually, I think there's more than just this one, because so far I have found the following articles. Please review them.
1. In https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.05.007 , section II"Regenerate response.." .
2. In https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2024.02.029 , section introduction“I'm sorry, but I don't have the document you're referring to ...”.
3. In https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8646-0_22, section Methodology “Certainly! Here is a more... ”
4. In https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2024.02.037 , paragraph before Conclusion "as I am an AI language model. "
I dont mind to use AI in a controllable way to make annoying procedures, like writing a necessary but boring email, way easier in order to direct all your effort to the important things, like project planning. but bruh... papers. and authors even did not check teh content of the ai text, reviewers did not control the data that was published meeeh comooon i am sad sorry
what do u think about that ?
#discussion@Sci_Neuro_Life
