🥩 Meat-routing and trust erosion
It is very tempting to copy-paste LLM answers or research as is. It usually looks great.
You validate it once, twice, three times... You make a few corrections but otherwise it's good. Then you start trusting and stop validating. Essentially, you are a meat router now.
Your colleagues will eventually notice, and ask themselves a few questions:
1. Can I trust this person any more than the LLM?
2. Has this person even read that response, or just forwarded it?
3. Can't I just use the LLM myself?
4. Why should I read that wall of text when I just need a yes or no?
That is, essentially, worse than "vibe-coding" — because there's no immediate feedback like "it doesn't work." A bad LLM answer can sit in a doc or a Slack thread for weeks, quietly trusted, before anyone notices.
The fix:
1. Consider answer a draft. Never forward it right away.
2. Compress it. If you can't reduce it to 1-2 sentences, you have not processed it.
3. Claim it. Take responsibility for the answer.
4. Verify the claim. Check what matters.
#llm #ai
Post #406
1.47K
- 👍 12
- 🔥 6
- 👏 4
- 💯 3
- 💩 1