boost::container::hub review starts today (April 16 - April 26)

Announced officially [in the Boost developer mailing list](https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/boost@lists.boost.org/thread/6ER3ZA4VMVKB57DDEXKO26UVYBP7I3QP/):

**Introduction**

The formal review of Joaquín M López Muñoz's boost::container::hub container, for inclusion in the Boost.Container library, starts today.

"hub" is a sequence container with O(1) insertion and erasure and element stability [with great performance (see these benchmarks)](https://github.com/joaquintides/hub/blob/develop/README.md#performance): pointers/iterators to an element remain valid as long as the element is not erased. hub is very similar but not entirely equivalent to C++26 std::hive (hence the different naming, [consult the section "Comparison with std::hive" for details)](https://github.com/joaquintides/hub/blob/develop/README.md#comparison-with-stdhive).

It may be downloaded from:

[https://github.com/joaquintides/hub](https://github.com/joaquintides/hub)

the documentation may be found here:

[https://github.com/joaquintides/hub/blob/develop/README.md](https://github.com/joaquintides/hub/blob/develop/README.md)

Anyone is welcome to post a review and/or take part in subsequent discussions in the mailing list.

**Review guidelines**

Please provide feedback on the following general topics:

* What is your evaluation of the design?
* What is your evaluation of the implementation?
* What is your evaluation of the documentation?
* What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the library? Do you already use it in industry?
* Did you try to use the library? With which compiler(s)? Did you have any problems?
* How much effort did you put into your evaluation? A glance? A quick reading? In-depth study?
* Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain?

Ensure to explicitly include with your review: ACCEPT, REJECT, or CONDITIONAL ACCEPT (with acceptance conditions).

Ion Gaztañaga (Review Manager)

https://redd.it/1smx361
@r_cpp